social-media-platforms · youtube
Best Social Media Platforms 2026, 189,607 Brand Deals Ranked
We track 189,607 paid brand integrations across YouTube and TikTok. The best platform is the one where your creators already charge a rate you can read, and most of them do not.
On this page
I want to start with one number that should change how you pick a platform.
In the social-platforms niche, we track 12,822 YouTube channels and exactly 10 TikTok accounts where the rate is something we can read.
That gap is the whole post.
If you came here for a ranked list of apps with monthly active users and a verdict on Threads, you can leave now, because that list will not tell you where your next creator campaign pays back.
The best platform is the one where the creators you want already hold a price, and where a deal you sign in August still earns in November.
I am going to rank platforms the only way that matters to a brand spending real money, by the deals we have actually watched close.
Which platform pays back for a brand campaign?
Here is where I am after indexing 189,607 paid brand integrations across 35,183 distinct brands since the start of our coverage.
YouTube is the default answer for most brands, and TikTok is the exception you reach for on purpose.
The reason is durability.
A YouTube integration sits inside a video that keeps getting watched, so the deal you bought in August is still working months later.
A TikTok post spikes and fades, which is great for a launch and weak for a always-on program.
Take Roel Van de Paar, a YouTube creator who ran 235 deals with the stock-media brand Bensound across our set.
That is not a one-off spike, that is a brand deciding a creator works and buying again 235 times.
You do not see that pattern on a platform built for the feed.
Look at the other repeat pairs and the story holds.
Ninad Music ran 120 deals each with Freepik, Pixabay, and Pixels, all on YouTube, all the same compounding pattern.
Bailey Vann ran 162 with Digitally Purposed.
These are not viral accidents, they are brands that found a creator and a platform where the math worked and kept pressing the button.
The lesson for your own program is plain.
A platform where your best deal keeps paying is worth more than a platform where your best deal trends for a day and disappears.
That is why I rank durability over raw reach for any brand that wants a program and not a one-time splash.
Sanity check on whether you even have a platform problem.
If your last campaign reached the right people but the cost per result was ugly, the platform is probably fine and the rate you paid was not.
If your last campaign reached the wrong people entirely, that is a platform-and-targeting problem, and switching apps without fixing the match will just waste money faster.
Picking the platform is picking the bench of creators behind it. That is the real choice.
What do creators actually charge on each platform?
Rates are where the platforms split hard, so let me put real numbers down.
In this niche we have 61 creators with a priced rate on file, and the spread by audience size is wide.
A 1M-plus subscriber YouTube creator runs a $20,000 median per integration (n=6), with the top quarter pushing to $35,000.
Drop to 250K to 1M subscribers and the median falls to $3,000 (n=15).
The 50K to 250K band, where most brand budgets actually live, sits at a $2,500 median (n=23) with a $1,100 floor.
Under 50K subscribers, creators run a $1,500 median (n=16) and start as low as $700.
Now hold that against TikTok, where we have 10 named accounts in this niche and not one with a clean rate on file.
That is the honest read.
TikTok has the reach, with accounts like garyvee at 15.2 million followers and rominagafur at 21.8 million in our set, but the pricing is opaque until you negotiate it deal by deal.
On YouTube, you can walk into a campaign already knowing the median is $2,500 for a mid-tier creator, and that changes how you plan a budget.
Run the ROI in plain numbers and the platform choice gets easier.
Say you have a $25,000 first budget and a product that nets $80 per sale.
On YouTube you can buy ten 50K to 250K creators at the $2,500 median, each inside a video that keeps getting found for months, so your cost per sale keeps dropping after the post goes live.
On TikTok you might spend the same $25,000 and get a bigger first-week spike, but once the post falls out of the feed the earning stops, so your real cost per sale is whatever you booked in week one.
For a brand that needs the math to keep working past launch week, the durable platform wins that comparison most of the time.
That is not a knock on TikTok, it is a reason to use it for the moment it is built for and not for the always-on program.
Here is the first place a brand gets burned, and where we earn our keep.
You can read a YouTube median off a chart, but the creator who quotes you $2,500 might have a real audience or a bought one, and the rate sheet will not tell you which.
We screen the audience before you wire money, so the $2,500 you spend reaches 2,500-dollars worth of real people, and we catch the fake-follower accounts before they become your invoice.
The cheaper platform is the one where you know what you bought.
How many creators can you actually reach?
Depth matters more than the headline platform, because a campaign needs a whole bench rather than one hero.
In the social-platforms niche alone we track 12,822 YouTube channels, and the shape of that pool is the good news.
About 9.9% of them are 1M-plus subscriber channels (n=12,822), which sounds small until you do the math and land at roughly 1,268 huge creators in one niche.
The middle is where the volume lives.
Roughly 31.6% sit in the 50K to 250K band and another 39.7% sit at 10K to 50K, so more than 9,000 channels in this niche are in the affordable, tight-audience range.
That is a deep bench. You are not fishing in a pond of twelve names.
TikTok, by contrast, gives us 10 readable accounts in the same niche, all of them massive, none of them cheap or easy to price.
So the platform that looks like the trendy choice is actually the shallow one for this category, at least in the data we can stand behind.
There is a reason that depth matters beyond just having names to choose from.
A deep bench lets you say no.
When you have 9,000 affordable channels to pick from, you can reject the creator whose audience looks bought, the one whose last sponsor was a competitor, and the one whose rate is double the median for no reason.
When you have ten names, you take what you can get, and that is how brands end up overpaying for a creator who was never a real fit.
The platform with the deeper bench is the platform where you keep the upper hand, and that upper hand is what keeps a campaign from going over budget.
If you want a tighter read on which creators match your product, the depth on YouTube is what makes a real shortlist possible.
Deep bench beats trendy app.
What do the repeat buyers know?
The brands that buy again are the ones worth copying, so look at what they do.
Across the 35,183 brands in our integration set, 15,113 have run more than one deal, a 43.0% repeat rate (n=35,183).
The top buyers are not chasing novelty.
BetterHelp ran 2,728 deals, Skillshare 2,027, and Squarespace 1,768, and almost all of that volume lives on YouTube where the integration keeps earning.
These brands figured out that a platform where a deal compounds beats a platform where a deal evaporates.
They also figured out the bench rule before they scaled.
None of them bet a whole program on three hero creators, they spread the spend across the deep middle of the niche where rates stay sane.
That is the move the 50K to 250K band exists for, and it is why a deep platform beats a flashy one when you are buying a quarter of work and not a single post.
A brand that buys 2,000 deals over time is not getting lucky, it is running a repeatable system on a platform that supports one.
There is a second thing the repeat buyers know, and it is the one that bites the newcomers.
A platform badge is not a disclosure.
Across all 260,527 deals we track, only 3.0% of call-to-action text carries a clear disclosure phrase, which means the field is full of programs the FTC reads as non-compliant.
The repeat buyers write the disclosure phrase into the creator brief so the platform choice never becomes a legal problem.
If that risk is new to you, our breakdown of what FTC enforcement actually targets is the place to start before you sign anything.
Repeat buyers pick durable platforms.
How we pick the platform for you
Here is the close, and it is the part where the platform question stops being abstract.
You do not need the best platform in general. You need the best platform for your product, your audience, and your budget, and that is a different answer for a supplement brand than for a SaaS tool.
We start from the 189,607 deals we have watched close and work backward to the platform where creators in your category already hold a readable rate.
Then we build the shortlist, screen every audience for bought followers, negotiate the rate against what we know the median to be, and write the disclosure phrase into the brief so a platform badge never becomes your liability.
That is the work that turns a platform pick into a campaign that pays back, and it is the work most brand teams do not have the data to do alone.
A brand team can read a chart of monthly active users in an afternoon.
What a brand team cannot do in an afternoon is tell you that a 50K to 250K creator in your category runs a $2,500 median, that 43.0% of brands buy again, and that only 3.0% of deals carry a real disclosure phrase.
Those are the numbers that decide whether a platform pays back, and they only exist if someone has been watching the deals close for years.
We have, across 189,607 of them, and that is the difference between picking a platform on vibes and picking one on evidence.
If you want us to point you at the platform and the bench your money should be on, tell us what you sell and who you want to reach, and we will run your category against the same 189,607-deal benchmark we use for every brand.
Pick durable. Buy proven.
Frequently asked
What is the best social media platform for brand creator campaigns in 2026?
For most brands it is YouTube, because creators there hold a price you can read and the deals last. Across our set we track 12,822 creators in the social-platforms niche on YouTube against 10 on TikTok. TikTok wins for fast reach, but the rate data is thinner.
How much do creators charge for a sponsored post?
It depends on the audience size. In this niche the median 250K to 1M subscriber creator charges $3,000 per integration (n=15), while a 50K to 250K creator runs a $2,500 median (n=23). Small creators under 50K subscribers sit closer to $700 to $1,500.
Should a brand run campaigns on more than one platform at once?
Only after one platform pays back. Pick the platform where your audience already buys, prove the math on five to ten deals, then add a second. Spreading a first budget across three platforms hides which one worked.
Do platform paid-partnership tags handle FTC disclosure?
No. The FTC position is that disclosure has to live in language the viewer reads, not only in a platform badge. Across the 260,527 deals we track only 3.0% of call-to-action text carries a clear disclosure phrase, so most programs are exposed.
How many creators can a brand reach in one niche?
More than most teams expect. In the social-platforms niche alone we track 12,822 YouTube channels, and 9,139 of them sit under 250K subscribers, which is the band where rates stay affordable and audiences stay tight.