← All case studies

Hair wellness / UGC · 2025

Nutrafol

We ran ten dermatologists telling their own postpartum hair-loss stories across 45 days, and not a single post got pulled. The spend came back 2.4x, because credibility is what carries this category.

2.4x
Return on spend
250K
Views together
10
Dermatologists
45
Days, staggered

01 · The rules

Hair-loss claims are a compliance minefield.

A supplement is allowed to support normal, healthy hair. The moment a post says it treats, cures or regrows, it becomes a drug claim, and both the FTC and the platforms come down on it.

That is exactly why Meta kept pulling Nutrafol’s ads. So rather than fight review, we built every read to sit cleanly inside the rules from the first frame:

  • Structure and function, not cure. Every script framed as support for normal, healthy hair. No disease language, no miracle-regrowth promise.
  • “Ask your dermatologist.” A derm on camera can point people to a professional instead of making a claim a platform can pull.
  • Substantiation up front. Breastfeeding-safe ingredients, clinical testing and published data in the first 10 seconds, not buried in a footer.
  • Clean histories, real disclosure. Creators with no prior strikes in supplements, every post marked as a partnership.

02 · How we ran it

Real dermatologists, highest-intent moment, safety up front.

Credibility was the whole strategy. Every choice pointed at the same thing: content a platform has no reason to pull and a buyer has every reason to trust.

  • 01Casting. Real dermatologists telling their own postpartum stories. Captions could say “ask your dermatologist” without tripping a review.
  • 02Framing. Built every brief around postpartum hair, the highest-intent buying moment in the category.
  • 03Safety up front. Breastfeeding-safe ingredients, clinical testing and published data in the first 10 seconds. Most supplement brands bury that in the footer.
  • 04Shortlist. 10 picks from 40, every one with a clean posting history in supplements.
  • 05Cadence. Spread across 45 days so it never read as a coordinated drop.
Channels

TikTok and Instagram, where the audience already researches this.

Timeline

45 days of staggered drops, so it built like word of mouth.

03 · On camera

The content that went live.

Vertical, native, filmed by the creators and dermatologists themselves. Clinical credibility in the first frame, the postpartum story in their own words, the kind of content a platform has no reason to pull.

TikTok
@kait.davis“Taking it over two years, dermatologist recommended.” #NutrafolPartner
Dermatologist“Postpartum shedding is normal. Here is what I recommend.”
Dermatologist“Breastfeeding-safe, clinically tested, here is the data.”
Native creator UGC · every post disclosed as a partnership

04 · The result

2.4x back, and zero posts pulled.

The ten dermatologists pulled in about 250,000 views together, and the campaign earned back $2.40 for every $1 we spent.

Not one post was taken down across the full 45 days. If we had put the same money into Meta ads, we would have lost most of the reach and probably gotten the ad account banned again. Credibility did not just keep the content up, it is what made it convert.

What we spent it on

Trust, not reach. Real experts in the highest-intent moment.

What came back

2.4x on spend, 250K views, and a clean record with the platforms.

Zero takedowns · 45 days, ten creators

Selling something the ad platforms keep pulling?

Let’s chat