What works in electrolyte creator marketing, and what to stop paying for

What to do first, if you sell electrolytes and want creators to move it

There is one number that predicts whether a hydration brand will still be buying creators in five years.

It is not what it spends. It is not how big the channels are. It is not even the product.

It is how often it books the same person twice.

Almost nobody on this shelf does it. So here is what to do about that, in the order it is worth doing.

1. Book fewer channels, and book them twice. Every brand still placing videos today goes back to people it has already used. The two that stopped never did.
2. Give something away instead of taking money off. The brand holding 70.8 percent of this shelf has never discounted, and has not wavered once since 2022.
3. Pick a programme shape you can afford. There are four shapes on this shelf and three of them are cheap.
4. Buy the middle. Nearly half of the leader's videos sit on channels between 100,000 and 500,000 subscribers. Only 4 percent sit above two million.
5. Go where nobody is bidding. Only 3.3 percent of the channels here have ever been paid by a second electrolyte brand, and the pharmacy aisle is close to empty.

Who says so: our own count of paid YouTube deals across 53 catalogued hydration brands, pulled 21 August 2026 and counted as distinct videos rather than table rows.

Why the second booking is the whole programme

A first video is a test. A second video is a programme. Fourteen firsts is fourteen strangers.

Consider Hydrant. In 2021 and 2022 it did everything a hydration brand is told to do. It found fourteen creators, paid them, and got fourteen videos back.

Then it stopped. Not the spending, not at first. The going back. It never booked a single one of those fourteen channels again, and it has recorded nothing at all since 2022.

Now consider DripDrop, which at the time looked like the smaller idea. Shorter list, smaller budget, less noise. But DripDrop went back to 86 percent of the channels it used, and then went back again, and five years later it is still buying.

Click to enlarge

Same category, same format, same platform, and the two outcomes went opposite ways. The difference was not money.

Look closely at that picture though, because it does not split as cleanly as the argument would like. Ultima rebooked 36 percent and died anyway. Precision Fuel sits below it at 29 percent and is alive. There is no magic threshold here, and anybody selling you one is guessing.

What there is, is a floor. Hydrant sits alone at zero, and zero is the only score on this shelf that has never once been survived.

If you have money for ten videos, book five channels twice, not ten channels once. It is the cheapest thing in this whole piece, because it costs nothing to apply. It is the same budget, spent in a different order.

Stop training your buyer to wait for a code

Every brand on this shelf takes money off, except the one that owns it.

Here is a question worth sitting with. If discount codes are how creator marketing works in this category, and they plainly are, then why does the brand holding 70.8 percent of the category almost never use one?

Click to enlarge

DripDrop takes money off on every single video it pays for. Redmond Re-Lyte on 99 percent of them, Skratch Labs on 92, Liquid I.V. on 91. LMNT does it on 4.

What LMNT does instead is give away four flavours with a full price order, on 87 percent of its videos. The rival hands over a markdown and gets a transaction. LMNT hands over a first taste and gets a habit.

And this is not a phase it grew out of, which is the part a founder will not believe until they see it year by year. LMNT ran the sample pack on 93 percent of placements in 2022, 91 in 2023, 92 in 2024, 89 in 2025 and 90 so far in 2026. It scaled into the biggest thing in the category and never once drifted toward discounting on the way up.

We found the same pattern on AG1 when we mapped the gaps on the wider supplement shelf, which suggests it is how winners on functional shelves behave, rather than one brand's quirk.

Which programme shape fits your budget

There are four shapes on this shelf, and only one of them needs a big budget.

Click to enlarge

The army. LMNT spreads 2,050 videos so thinly that no single channel is worth more than 4 percent of the programme, and it goes back to half of them. Nobody is load bearing, so nobody leaving hurts. This one needs scale, and it is the shape everybody copies and almost nobody can afford.

The few, deep. DripDrop and Cure Hydration each run a short list and go back to 86 and 71 percent of it. Look at where they sit on the chart above. They are specks. They are also both still buying, which is more than most of the brands around them can say.

The one horse. Precision Fuel puts 76 percent of its programme on a single channel, Singletrack. LiveSalt puts 37 percent on Courtney Luna. It is cheap and it works, right up until that one channel changes what it makes.

The spray that stopped. Hydrant. Fourteen channels, one video each, nothing since 2022.

There is a fifth shape that is not a shape at all. Nuun, Tailwind and BioSteel have one recorded video each. Electrolit and BodyArmor have two. Buoy and Waterboy have three, and Gatorade has six, all inside a single quarter of 2024. Those are flights around something, not programmes, and every one of them stopped.

Buy the middle of the market

Nearly half of the shelf leader's videos sit on channels between 100,000 and 500,000 subscribers.

Here is the thing nobody expects about the biggest creator programme in hydration. It is not built on famous people.

Where a channel's subscriber count is recorded, 46 percent of LMNT's placements sit in that 100,000 to 500,000 band. 10 percent are under 100,000. Only 4 percent are above two million. The median channel it buys has 339,000 subscribers, which is a good living and not a household name.

That figure holds for LMNT because three quarters of its placements resolve to a known subscriber count. It does not hold for anyone else on the shelf, so we are not quoting theirs. Liquid I.V. resolves for 28 percent and Redmond Re-Lyte for 10, and a size mix built on a tenth of a list tells you about our coverage rather than about the brand.

But the one brand we can see properly built the largest programme in the category without buying a single famous person.

Where the open ground is

Almost nobody on this shelf has been approached twice.

Only 3.3 percent of the channels here have ever been booked by a second electrolyte brand. Sit with what that means. Ninety seven percent of the people who have already proved they can sell hydration to an audience have never been contacted by anybody else selling hydration.

The overlap that does exist is almost entirely LMNT against Redmond Re-Lyte, the two high salt brands, which is the one place on the shelf where two rivals are competing over the same names.

Three more openings fall out of the same pull.

The pharmacy aisle is nearly empty. Pedialyte, the brand every parent already owns, has zero recorded creator deals. Hydralyte, Trioral and Electrolit sit between zero and two. DripDrop is the only brand treating oral rehydration as a creator category at all, and it is doing it with a short list.

The sports drink giants are not competing for this format. Gatorade has six videos, BodyArmor two, BioSteel one, Powerade none. They buy athletes and broadcast instead, so a brand willing to show up where they are absent has an open run at it.

Prime Hydration has no recorded sponsored videos, and that is not a hole in our data. Every Prime domain in the whole pairing table turns out to be a trading platform or an Amazon link. The biggest creator founded brand in the category does not buy creator sponsorship, because its founders are the channel. Whether that is a model to copy or a one off is a question the United Kingdom accounts further down answer fairly bluntly.

The pharmacy aisle is also the one that needs the most care, because a rehydration claim is a health claim, and a creator saying it in their own words is still your liability. That part is the work we do, we write the claim library the creator has to stay inside, check every cut before it posts, and keep the disclosure where a regulator expects to find it. What the rules ask of you and of them covers the ground if you would rather run it yourself.

Is the category concentrating or opening up

It is opening, and the leader is losing ten points of share while still growing.

The obvious read of a shelf where one brand holds 70.8 percent is that the door is shut. The obvious read is wrong.

Click to enlarge

Raw yearly totals say the shelf went flat in 2026, and that is an artifact of how we catch videos. Our pipeline picks placements up over the following weeks, so the current month always looks empty. Comparing two clean twelve month windows removes the problem, and what it shows is that LMNT grew, and everybody else grew almost twice as fast.

LMNT's share of the shelf fell from 82.2 percent to 71.7 percent inside a single year. Five brands went from nothing to a running programme in that same window. DripDrop went from 0 videos to 69, LiveSalt 0 to 34, Ultima 0 to 14, Cure Hydration 4 to 31, Precision Fuel 2 to 23.

So the category's creator spending is not quietly collapsing into one brand that is pulling back. It is a leader still growing, and a field growing faster.

What the shelf looks like outside YouTube

The retail picture and the creator picture disagree, and both are true.

Published scanner data says the big ready to drink sports shelf is mature. United States non aseptic sports drink sales were above 11.5 billion dollars in the 52 weeks to 20 April 2025, and the shelf still fell 0.5 percent in dollars, with NielsenIQ separately reporting sports drinks down 3.7 percent in units. The powder and stick shelf is far smaller at 1.5 billion dollars, and it has a leader growing fast, with Liquid I.V. just above 905 million dollars and up 28.2 percent.

Four outside cases are worth carrying into a brief.

Electrolit is the one where distribution came first. Keurig Dr Pepper said Electrolit had crossed 400 million dollars in United States retail sales and grown more than tenfold in five years when it signed a national distribution deal in October 2023. Electrolit has visible athlete and creator activity, and two recorded videos in our table, which means its creator work is happening somewhere we cannot see and is not obviously tied to store velocity. New doors need local trial, not another awareness campaign.

Cure is the one where the problem turned out to be the occasion. Its founder told Modern Retail that party and festival and hangover targeting did not work, which moved the brand toward health and fitness creators posting more often. That is a better lesson than any impressions figure, because it says the fix for a programme that is not converting is usually a different moment, not a bigger list.

Waterboy is the one where the founder was the channel. Its founders reported roughly 65,000 dollars of presales off their first TikTok and about 10 million dollars of sales in two years, on their own account rather than a roster. Those are founder claims and nobody has audited them. The lesson survives anyway, which is that the job around a founder like that is to formalise what already works, never to recreate their personality with hired people.

PRIME and BioSteel are the ones where attention was not enough. PRIME's United Kingdom turnover fell from 112.2 million pounds to 32.8 million in the 2024 accounts, with profit down 91.6 percent. BioSteel had the National Hockey League, Connor McDavid and Nathan MacKinnon, roughly 24 million dollars of quarterly revenue, and filed for creditor protection anyway. Neither failure was about influencer marketing. Both were about economics that no amount of sponsorship could repair.

Who says so: Circana and NielsenIQ figures as reported by Beverage Industry, July 2025; Keurig Dr Pepper's own announcement of the Electrolit partnership, October 2023; Modern Retail on Cure; Retail Brew on Waterboy; Marketing Week on PRIME's filed United Kingdom accounts; CBC on the BioSteel court filings.

What the numbers do not show

Every count here is a floor, it is one platform only, and this category sells hard on the platforms we are not counting.

These are paid YouTube deals. Instagram, TikTok, campus programmes, athlete contracts and podcast buys made outside YouTube are not in the pull. That caveat weighs more here than on most shelves, because a stick pack is a visual product that works in short vertical video. Electrolit at two videos and Prime at zero are the two to distrust most.

It counts videos, not money. A brand running twenty podcast reads at mid five figures outranks one running four hundred micro placements on spend, and loses on our table.

We count channels, not people. A channel gets renamed, one person runs several, so we publish shares and video counts and never a headcount, because a headcount would be the one number here you could not check.

And the offer split is what the viewer was told, not what the brand paid. A sample pack on 87 percent of videos says how LMNT converts. It says nothing about what that costs.

A number this specific is only worth something if you also know what it cannot see.

What to ask for before you spend anything

If a brand cannot answer these five, the next step is a diagnostic and not a campaign.

1. The split of sales by channel, so a creator can be pointed at the one that converts.
2. The top twenty retail markets or doors, because creator trial only pays where the product is already stocked.
3. The repeat purchase or subscription cohort, since a hydration buyer who does not come back makes any acquisition number meaningless.
4. What the existing affiliate list actually earns, minus the coupon sites, so leakage shows up before it gets scaled.
5. The next distribution, product or occasion objective, which is the thing the creator work has to serve.

That is the whole brief. Everything above this line is evidence. Everything below it is us.

So here is the offer, and it is not a pitch. Send us your brand name and we will build the first chart in this post for your shelf instead of ours. Your rivals on it, every channel each of them has paid, what each channel took, and which of those channels has been booked a second time. That last column is the one nobody has, and it is the one that told us Hydrant was finished two years before its last video went up. It is free, it takes about 48 hours, and it is yours to use with us or without us. Send us the brand name.

Keep reading

• The bigger picture. The brands paying YouTube creators most in 2026
• The shelf next door, priced the same way. What the energy drink shelf pays creators
• Before you brief anyone on rehydration. What the rules ask of you and of them