The full playbook for building a creator community

How brands turn one-off creator deals into a community that keeps posting for months.

Dennis Ksendzov
Dennis KsendzovVerified

Founder · October 2, 2026 · 78 min read

Should you build a creator community?

The short answer

The thesis is half right, and the right half matters more.

The pattern is real and recurs across forty years and every category, from Harley riders in 1983 to a chocolate startup running a creator Discord last year. Our own database shows it too, the one piece of evidence here that nobody sold us.

The second half, that these brands "do really well", is not established. Community and success turn up together, and almost nobody has shown which causes which. The best designed test on this question found no effect, and some of the largest companies in the world have closed the programs people hold up as proof.

A creator community is one way to buy a standing relationship with creators. Standing relationships compound, and the community version is the hardest to copy and the easiest to get wrong.

Where the thesis holds

The shape keeps reappearing

The same structure shows up in places that were not copying each other, which is as strong as a pattern gets without a controlled trial.

Brand What the community is The number
Tabs Chocolate A Discord where 250 creators share hooks and briefs $11M in 18 months, close to no paid ads
Olipop Seeded creators plus a commission ladder, 1,400 codes Creator sales went from 4% to 12% of all sales
Sephora Squad A paid year long cohort you apply to 30,000 applications in 2021, running 8 years
Gymshark Seeding, then athletes, then their own event A £300 a day business took £30,000 in 30 minutes
Salesforce Trailblazers, badges and local chapters 18 million members
Roblox Creators build the actual product $410.6M paid out to creators in six months
LEGO Ideas Fans design sets, the designer takes 1% 3.43 million members, 23 sets shipped
Harley-Davidson Owners group, running since 1983 Over 1 million members

Tabs Chocolate is closest to your example: a Discord where creators trade what is working, and the company grew on it rather than on ads.

The Roblox and LEGO numbers are the sturdiest in the table, because they are filed with regulators or tied to a published royalty.

Tabs Chocolate

A Discord where 250 creators share hooks and briefs

  • $11M in 18 months, close to no paid ads
  • Creators trade what is working in the room

tabschocolate.com

How sure we are: The headcount comes from their software vendor.

Olipop

Seeded creators plus a commission ladder, 1,400 codes

  • Creator sales went from 4% to 12% of all sales

drinkolipop.com

How sure we are: The 982% return comes from the brand's affiliate software vendor, so it is a sales page, not an audited result. No video here: every result was a stranger's taste test, not the creator programme.

Sephora Squad

A paid year long cohort you apply to

  • 30,000 applications in 2021, running 8 years
  • More than 250 creators since 2019
  • A 12 month term, pay reported at $5,000 to $50,000 a year

Open it: https://www.sephora.com/beauty/sephora-squad

No preview card, the page did not load for us (HTTP 403 Forbidden).

How sure we are: The pay band comes from reporting, not a filing. The quoted 68 out of 16,000 ratio describes one earlier cycle, so read it as a shape, not a rate.

Gymshark

Seeding, then athletes, then their own event

  • A 300 pound a day business took 30,000 pounds in 30 minutes
  • 125 paid influencers as of 2020, with no published headcount since

Open it: https://www.gymshark.com/pages/athletes

No preview card, the page did not load for us (HTTP 404 Not Found).

How sure we are: The event worked partly because the brand was already hot, the cause and effect question this page could not settle.

Salesforce Trailblazers

Trailblazers, badges and local chapters

  • 18 million members
  • More than 200,000 members across more than 800 groups in the shapes table

trailhead.salesforce.com

How sure we are: Salesforce's own published membership number.

Roblox

Creators build the actual product

  • $410.6M paid out to creators in six months
  • About 85% of Roblox developers earn under $100 a month

create.roblox.com

How sure we are: One of the two sturdiest numbers in the table, because it is filed with regulators.

LEGO Ideas

Fans design sets, the designer takes 1%

  • 3.43 million members
  • A 1% royalty on net sales, ten free sets, and a credit on the box

ideas.lego.com

How sure we are: The 1% royalty is solid everywhere. The count of sets shipped is quoted three incompatible ways, so use the royalty, not the count.

Harley-Davidson Owners Group

Owners group, running since 1983

  • Over 1 million members
  • Forty years of the same structure, which is where this pattern starts

Open it: https://www.harley-davidson.com/us/en/club/index.html

No preview card, the page did not load for us (HTTP 404 Not Found).

How sure we are: Harley-Davidson's own published membership number.

One study found a causal effect

Manchanda, Packard and Pattabhiramaiah (Marketing Science, 2015) compared customers who joined a retailer's community against a matched group who did not, before and after launch. 19% of the revenue after launch was caused by joining, not just correlated with it, and the effect held over time and across channels.

Bapna and Umyarov (Management Science, 2015) gave away Last.fm premium subscriptions at random and watched what friends did next. Being connected to a new subscriber raised the odds a person paid by more than 60%.

The community sometimes comes first

SITS Girls was a blogging community that became a bookable network of about 50,000 publishers and was bought in 2014. The room came before the roster, and the roster is what got sold.

SITS Girls, then Sway Group

A blogging community that became a bookable network and was sold

  • About 50,000 publishers
  • Bought in 2014
  • The room came before the roster, and the roster is what got sold

swaygroup.com

How sure we are: The clearest case here of a community coming first, not built on top of a brand that already worked.

What our own numbers say

This comes from our own sponsor deal table, counting each sponsored video once.

On the same shelf, the community brand keeps its creators

AG1 and LMNT sell a similar product to a similar person and started buying creators within a month of each other in 2021, and behave very differently.

AG1 LMNT
Creators booked 1,109 414
Sponsored videos 2,805 2,128
Booked more than once 36% 56%
Average times booked 2.53 5.14

LMNT runs a roster a third the size and gets three quarters of the output by rebooking the same people.

LMNT's heaviest creators are a fitness coach with 123,000 subscribers, a keto channel, a hiking channel, an ultrarunner and a farming channel. AG1's heaviest are Tim Ferriss, Lex Fridman and a travel channel with 4.5 million subscribers.

LMNT puts 71% of its money into creators under 500,000 subscribers, and AG1 puts 53%. LMNT's largest creator group is health at 36%. For AG1 health comes fifth, behind lifestyle, travel, sports and entertainment.

One brand is buying into practices where an electrolyte is already part of the daily routine, so it can stay. The other is buying attention, so it has to keep shopping.

LMNT, the videos behind that number

414 creators, 2,128 videos, 56% booked more than once, 5.14 times each on average.

An electrolyte is already part of these creators' daily routine, so the brand can stay.

AG1, the videos behind that number

1,109 creators, 2,805 videos, 36% booked more than once, 2.53 times each on average.

AG1 is buying attention, so it has to keep shopping.

Retention on its own is not proof of a community

I measured how concentrated each brand's creators are, on the theory that a community around a shared practice would show up as a focused roster. Across 25 brands and 51,000 sponsored videos, concentration has no relationship with how often a brand re-books (correlation minus 0.02).

Squarespace has the most scattered roster measured and the highest loyalty: 91% of its creators booked more than once, eight videos each on average. It has no community, just an affiliate program that has been open and paying for a decade.

A standing relationship produces loyalty, and a community is only one way to buy one. A long running affiliate program is a cheaper way that works.

Squarespace

The most scattered roster measured and the highest loyalty measured

  • 91% of its creators booked more than once, an average of eight videos each
  • No community, just an affiliate program open and paying for a decade

squarespace.com

How sure we are: Ours, from the sponsor deal table.

Widening it to 44 brands makes this worse, not better

A second pass covered 44 brands and 70,000 sponsored videos. If the thesis held as a ranking, brands with famous creator communities would top it. They do not.

Brand Re-booked What it runs
Squarespace 90% An affiliate program, no community
Blue Chew 81% An affiliate program, no community
Momentous 71% Athlete roster
WHOOP 60% Athlete and member community
Gymshark 60% The athlete program everyone copies
Liquid I.V. 59% 4,115 campus ambassadors
LMNT 56% Athletes and podcast roster
Notion 29% The ambassador program tech writes about
Bloom Nutrition 22% Ambassadors
Established Titles 21% Pure paid placements

The top two have no community at all, and Notion, the program software people cite most, sits near the bottom.

Two rows are too thin to lean on. Notion is probably split across three domains we hold separately, and Bloom shows only 24 videos, a hole in our coverage rather than a finding.

What survives is the comparison within one shelf. AG1, LMNT and Ritual sell the same kind of product to the same person and started a month apart, so the other explanations for the gap are held still. Across shelves, payment structure matters more than community, which is why Squarespace tops the table.

Where the thesis breaks

The best designed test found nothing

Algesheimer, Borle, Dholakia and Singh ran a year long randomised field experiment at eBay Germany (Marketing Science, 2010). Inviting customers into the community raised participation. Participation then had no effect on bids or revenue, and a negative effect on listings and on how much people spent.

It is the cleanest test on this question, and it did not support the thesis. One market is not every market, so it does not settle the argument, but it means the effect shows up in some settings and not others rather than being a law.

Large companies keep closing these programs

What closed When
Xbox Ambassadors, after 13 years October 2024
Discord's own Partner Program October 2023
Duolingo Clubs, forums and Events 2022 and 2023
My Starbucks Idea, 190,000 ideas and 277 built 2018
Glossier's rep program Discontinued

Discord closed its own partner program, and Discord is the example in the thesis. Duolingo, the company most often held up as proof that community works, switched to streaks, leaderboards and notifications after listing.

Xbox Ambassadors, closed

Shut down in October 2024, after 13 years

  • Thirteen years of a program held up as proof that this works

news.xbox.com

How sure we are: Announced by the company. No video here: every result was about Xbox Insider or the reporting tool, not the Ambassadors programme.

Discord Partner Program, closed

Discord closed its own partner program in October 2023

  • Discord is the example in the thesis

support.discord.com

How sure we are: Announced by Discord. No video here: nothing on YouTube covers the closure.

Duolingo Clubs and forums, closed

Clubs, forums and Events all shut, 2022 and 2023

  • The volunteer contributor programme was shut down
  • Contributors were offered paid roles and a shared $4,000,000 fund
  • What exists now is a fan run server, not a brand one

blog.duolingo.com

How sure we are: Duolingo is the company most often held up as proof that community works, and after listing it switched to streaks, leaderboards and notifications.

My Starbucks Idea, closed

190,000 ideas and 277 built, then closed in 2018

  • Asked people to gather around the company itself, like every dead program on this list

stories.starbucks.com

How sure we are: Starbucks' own published totals.

Glossier rep program, closed

Discontinued

  • Our own table holds 38 videos across 15 creators for Glossier
  • That 60% re-book rate is fifteen people, so read the count, not the rate

glossier.com

How sure we are: Ours for the video count. The closure is reported rather than announced.

Almost every number is sold by somebody

Olipop's 982% return, Tabs' 9.8x, Kettle & Fire's cost per engagement and Cozy Earth's 55% of revenue all come from the software vendor the brand was using. impact.com, Social Snowball, Aspire and MOGL each want the number large, and none of these figures has been independently audited.

Lululemon's 1,500 ambassadors are verifiable. The return on them is not published anywhere, and the "high ROI" claim traces back to a marketing blog.

A described community and a working one are different things

Neuro Gum's founder describes 500 creators in a Discord with a sales floor to stay in, three tiers, a recorded orientation and a quarterly call with the chief executive. On paper, it is your thesis at its best.

We hold no TikTok records for them. What we can see is 38 placements across 16 channels, the top three creators holding half the work, and no sponsored video since 27 June 2026. The community may be real, but it was invisible in the only evidence we have.

Neuro Gum

500 creators in a Discord, described by the founder

  • A sales floor to stay in, three tiers, a recorded orientation and a quarterly call with the chief executive
  • What we can see is 38 placements across 16 channels
  • The top three creators hold half the work, and nothing since 27 June 2026

neurogum.com

How sure we are: Described by the founder, never verified from outside. We hold no TikTok records for them, so the community was invisible in the only evidence we have.

The success does not track the community either

AG1 has the worst creator loyalty on its shelf and is one of the largest supplement brands in the world. PRIME runs collegiate ambassadors and posted a 70.7% fall in UK turnover in its 2024 accounts. Temu and Shein became the fourth and ninth largest digital advertisers in the United States with no community of any kind.

If community caused success we would not see this much of both without each other.

Most communities are a few dozen people and an audience

At Atlassian, 12% of users answered 91% of the questions. About 85% of Roblox developers earn under $100 a month. A community of 500 usually means 20 people talking and 480 reading, and the 20 produce the result.

The version that survives

Three claims survive.

A standing relationship beats a placement, and it compounds. Every brand in our data with loyalty above 55% has some structure holding creators in place: a community, an athlete roster or an affiliate program that never closes. The structure is needed but not enough, because Notion has an ambassador program everyone writes about and sits at 29%.

Having the program is not the thing, using it is.

The community has to be about something other than the brand. LMNT's creators are held together by keto, ultrarunning and hiking, not by an electrolyte. Tabs' Discord is held together by learning to make ads that work, and the school communities you mentioned by the subject.

The dead programs above, My Starbucks Idea, the Glossier reps and Duolingo's forums, all asked people to gather around the company itself.

The advantage is that it is hard. An affiliate program buys the same loyalty faster and cheaper, and anyone can copy it by Friday. A community around a practice takes years and cannot be bought, which is why brands that have one are hard to dislodge and why most attempts fail.

Dennis, what I could not settle is whether community causes growth or successful brands can simply afford one. Gymshark's event worked partly because the brand was already hot. The next step would be to take ten brands with a known community start date and measure their creator loyalty before and after, the same method as the Marketing Science study, and possible with our data.

What this means for us

We already sell what this argument points at. Our data shows brands losing half their roster after one video, and we can now price that against a competitor who keeps theirs.

The pitch is not "build a community", a two year project a marketing manager cannot approve. The pitch is the gap: AG1 books 1,109 creators to get 2,805 videos while LMNT books 414 to get 2,128, and LMNT is not smarter, it just stays.

We looked at this for ourselves in the creator signup work and decided against it: at our size the database row is the asset, and a community of 40 people reads as dead. That still holds for us, and it does not weaken the case for a brand that already has thousands of creators.

Competitions, prizes, and the rooms brands run

What a creator competition buys, the eight shapes a creator community takes, and what our data says about both

The short answer on competitions

The word competition covers three things, and two are not community at all. One is an ad buy with a prize attached. One is recruitment.

Only the third, a contest among people already in the room, is a community event, and almost nobody publishes numbers on it.

Our own data draws the line. The brands famous for creator competitions barely book creators. Doritos has one recorded sponsored video in our table, Lay's one, Chipotle five, Duolingo five, Discord three.

Sephora, which runs a cohort you apply to instead, has 298 videos across 105 creators and books more than half of them again.

A competition gets a brand content without taking on creators. A community takes on creators without paying for every video. They are not two versions of one idea, and a brand that runs the first while calling it the second gets neither.

Three kinds of competition, and only one is a community

One, the spectacle. A huge prize, one winner, thousands or hundreds of thousands of entries. Doritos Crash the Super Bowl and Lay's Do Us a Flavor are the famous two.

The prize buys press and a pile of entries from strangers, and almost none of them hears from the brand again. It is advertising with a contest bolted on, and it works on those terms.

Two, the audition. The prize is the contract. e.l.f.

gave three winners a paid representation deal in 2020. Sephora picks a cohort out of applications every year. Chipotle opened the fifteenth seat of its Creator Class by public contest.

This is recruitment: the competition is the door into a community, not the community.

Three, the internal contest. A leaderboard, a monthly sales race, a prize for the best hook, a trip for the top ten, run among ambassadors already signed. It is the only real community event of the three, and it has almost no public evidence, because the numbers sit with the brand instead of in a press release.

The third kind is the one worth copying, and the one this document could not settle.

What was actually run, and what the prize was

Competition Year The prize and the scale
Doritos, Crash the Super Bowl 2025 $1,000,000, a first quarter Super Bowl slot and a trip. Opened September 2024, thousands of entries cut to 25 finalists, then a public vote. Won by Dylan Bradshaw and Nate Norell for a spot called Abduction
Lay's, Do Us a Flavor Oct 2024 to Feb 2025 $1,000,000 to the winner, $50,000 to each of two runners up, on more than 700,000 submissions. Won by Paula George for Bacon Grilled Cheese
e.l.f., Eyes. Lips. Famous. 2020 Three winners, each a $5,000 representation contract and a year of product
Chipotle, Creator Class 2021 14 founding creators, the 15th seat opened by public contest. The prize was the contract, with no separate cash figure published
Sephora Squad Yearly since 2019 A 12 month paid term, reported between $5,000 and $50,000 a year and negotiated per deliverable
Snapchat, Spotlight 2020 to 2021 $250,000,000 paid to more than 12,000 creators in the first year, against a promised $1,000,000 a day. Cut back, then closed
YouTube, Shorts Fund 2021 to 2023 $100,000,000 in total, paid at $100 to $10,000 a month, then replaced by a share of advertising revenue
Gymshark66 Annual A 66 day challenge with a shortlist and a named winner. No prize value published anywhere I could reach

How sure we are of each of those

Doritos and Lay's are the sturdiest, because both companies put the prize and the entry count in their own press releases and both were reported independently.

Sephora's pay band, the Spotlight total and the Shorts Fund come from reporting, not filings, so they are good but second hand. The most quoted Sephora ratio, roughly 68 chosen out of more than 16,000 applications, describes one earlier cycle reprinted without its year, so read it as a shape, not a rate.

Gymshark66 is the most cited creator challenge in fitness and its prize is not published, which usually means the prize is the attention.

One number here comes from a software vendor, not a brand. Social Snowball publishes an ambassador programme that took 1,500 applications in three months at a claimed sixteen times return, brand unnamed. That is a sales page, not a result.

Doritos, Crash the Super Bowl 2025

$1,000,000, a first quarter Super Bowl slot and a trip

  • Opened September 2024, thousands of entries cut to 25 finalists, then a public vote
  • Won by Dylan Bradshaw and Nate Norell for a spot called Abduction
  • One recorded sponsored video in our table

doritos.com

How sure we are: Prize and entry count are in Doritos' own press release, and were reported independently.

Lay's, Do Us a Flavor

$1,000,000 to the winner on more than 700,000 submissions

  • $50,000 to each of two runners up
  • Won by Paula George for Bacon Grilled Cheese
  • One recorded sponsored video in our table

lays.com

How sure we are: Prize and entry count are in the company's own press release, and were reported independently.

e.l.f., Eyes. Lips. Famous.

Three winners, each a $5,000 representation contract and a year of product

  • Run in 2020
  • The prize is the contract, so this is recruitment, not a contest
  • e.l.f. lives on TikTok, so its 27 videos here are a coverage hole, not a fact about the brand

elfcosmetics.com

How sure we are: Reported, and the structure is confirmed by the brand. No video here: nothing on YouTube covers the 2020 contest.

Chipotle, Creator Class

14 founding creators, the 15th seat opened by public contest

  • Run in 2021
  • The prize was the contract, with no separate cash figure published
  • Five recorded videos in our table, a coverage hole because Chipotle is TikTok-native

newsroom.chipotle.com

How sure we are: Announced by the company. No video here: nothing on YouTube covers the Creator Class.

Snapchat, Spotlight

$250,000,000 paid to more than 12,000 creators in the first year

  • Against a promised $1,000,000 a day
  • Cut back, then closed

newsroom.snap.com

How sure we are: From reporting, not a filing, so second hand.

YouTube, Shorts Fund

$100,000,000 in total, paid at $100 to $10,000 a month

  • Ran 2021 to 2023
  • Replaced by a share of advertising revenue

blog.youtube

How sure we are: From reporting, not a filing, so second hand. No video here: every result was a general monetisation explainer, not the Shorts Fund.

Gymshark66

A 66 day challenge with a shortlist and a named winner

  • Annual
  • No prize value published anywhere we could reach

gymshark.com

How sure we are: The most cited creator challenge in fitness, with no published prize, which usually means the prize is the attention.

The rooms brands run for their own creators

Brand The room What is inside it
Tabs Chocolate Discord More than 100 creators trading hooks, performance updates and the brand's best performing assets. The headcount comes from the software vendor whose product they use
Neuro Gum Discord Tiers unlocked by sales, a sales floor to stay in, and a quarterly call with the chief executive. Described by the founder, never verified from outside
Notion Two Slack workspaces Around 200 ambassadors across 23 countries, more than 600 applications in the first week. Channels by country and one where members compare what they earn from templates and courses
Sephora Squad An in house portal More than 250 creators since 2019, with campaigns, events and training sessions run by Sephora's own teams
Duolingo Closed The volunteer contributor programme was shut down. Contributors were offered paid roles and a shared $4,000,000 fund. What exists now is a fan run server, not a brand one
Gymshark Public Discord About 1,400 members and open to anyone, so this is a fan server rather than a vetted creator room

The absence is worth stating plainly

We searched eighteen other brands for a private creator room and found nothing published where we could read it: Fanatics, Liquid I.V., Webflow, Figma, Canva, Adobe, Glossier, Bumble, Red Bull, Alo, Vuori, Celsius, poppi, Olipop, Crocs, e.l.f., Shopify, and Discord's own partner programme. Figma's two communities are open and public, not vetted.

That is absence of evidence, not evidence of absence. A private room is private, so the ones that work are the ones a search cannot see, and the ones we can read about are the ones somebody wanted us to see. Both Discords in the table above are known only because a vendor or a founder chose to describe them.

Notion ambassadors

Around 200 ambassadors across 23 countries, in two Slack workspaces

  • More than 600 applications in the first week
  • Channels by country, and one where members compare what they earn from templates and courses
  • The program tech writes about most, at 29% re-booked in our table

Open it: https://www.notion.so/Notion-Ambassador-Program-45448f9b8e704c7bab254bd505c4717c

No preview card, the page did not load for us (a page with nothing to read, matched window.location.replace).

How sure we are: Described publicly. Our 29% is probably split across three domains we hold separately, so treat the rate as thin.

The eight shapes a creator community takes

The shape A brand doing it The number
The paid cohort you apply to Sephora Squad A 12 month term, pay reported at $5,000 to $50,000 a year
The campus rep programme Red Bull Student Marketeers More than 4,000 worldwide, running since 1987
The athlete or expert roster Gymshark 125 paid influencers as of 2020, with no published headcount since
The affiliate ladder that climbs with sales Abercrombie Creator Suite Tiers reported at 10% up to either 25% or 33%, and the two sources disagree
Co-creation, where the community makes the product LEGO Ideas A 1% royalty on net sales, ten free sets, and a credit on the box
The event or trip as the centre of it Revolve Festival 1,200 to 1,500 invited for 2026, mostly creators
The brief sharing room, creators teaching each other Tabs Chocolate More than 100 creators in one Discord
Badges, tiers and leaderboards Salesforce Trailblazers More than 200,000 members across more than 800 groups

Two rows need a warning.

The affiliate ladder is the worst documented shape on the list, though most brands could start one on Monday. Nobody publishes their tier schedule, and both Abercrombie figures come from a company that sells affiliate software and disagree with each other.

LEGO Ideas is the best documented and still gets misquoted. The 1% royalty is consistent everywhere. The count of sets shipped is not: sources say 50 as of 2022, 82 including sets only announced, and 19 currently in production, which are three different questions wearing one number.

Use the royalty, not the count.

Red Bull Student Marketeers

More than 4,000 worldwide, running since 1987

  • The biggest community named on this page
  • 34 recorded sponsored videos across 28 creators, 14% booked again
  • Only Bumble is lower

studentmarketeer.redbull.com

How sure we are: Red Bull's own recruitment page for the headcount, ours for the videos.

Abercrombie Creator Suite

An affiliate ladder that climbs with sales

  • Tiers reported at 10% up to either 25% or 33%, and the two sources disagree

abercrombie.com

How sure we are: Both figures come from a company that sells affiliate software, and they disagree. No video here: nobody films a tier schedule either.

Revolve Festival

The event or trip as the centre of it

  • 1,200 to 1,500 invited for 2026, mostly creators

Open it: https://www.revolve.com/

No preview card, the page did not load for us (https://www.revolve.com/ could not be fetched: TimeoutError:).

How sure we are: Reported invite counts, not a published figure.

What our own numbers say

Same method as part one: a booking is one distinct video, counted once, so a video recorded twice cannot make a one off creator look like a repeat.

The competition brands do not buy creators

Brand Videos we hold Creators Booked again
Doritos 1 1 0%
Lay's 1 1 0%
Discord 3 3 0%
Chipotle 5 3 33%
Duolingo 5 5 0%
Crocs 25 22 14%
e.l.f. 27 22 18%
Bumble 29 14 7%
Red Bull 34 28 14%
Glossier 38 15 60%
Salesforce 41 24 29%
Roblox 42 19 16%
Xbox 46 32 28%
Figma 54 21 52%
Lululemon 83 48 23%
LEGO 101 61 39%
Adobe 179 95 30%
Sephora 298 105 51%
Canva 311 117 52%

The top and bottom of that table are two different worlds. The five brands with the most famous creator competitions sit in the first five rows with fifteen videos between them. The two running application cohorts, Sephora and Canva, sit at the bottom with 609 videos and repeat booking above half.

A competition is not a way of working with creators. It gets their output without the relationship, and our table shows what that looks like a year or two later.

Sephora, the videos behind that number

298 videos across 105 creators, 51% booked again.

Runs an application cohort, not a competition.

Canva, the videos behind that number

311 videos across 117 creators, 52% booked again.

The other application cohort. Sephora and Canva hold 609 videos between them, against fifteen for the five most famous competitions.

The biggest community on the list has nearly the worst loyalty

Red Bull has more than 4,000 student marketeers, the biggest community named here, and 34 recorded sponsored videos across 28 creators, of which 14% came back for a second. Only Bumble is lower.

Those 4,000 people are not turning into standing relationships with paid creators. The community and the creator roster are two separate systems inside one company, and neither feeds the other.

Red Bull, the videos behind that number

34 videos across 28 creators, 14% booked again, beside 4,000 student marketeers.

Where these numbers are thin

Below about 100 videos, read the count and ignore the rate. Glossier's 60% is fifteen creators, Bumble's 7% is fourteen, Roblox's 16% is nineteen. A percentage over that few people moves by ten points if one creator posts once more.

This is YouTube only. A brand that lives on TikTok, like e.l.f. or Chipotle, shows up here as a hole in our coverage, not a finding about the brand.

Where the prize model breaks

The law treats a prize very differently from a fee

In the United States a contest decided by chance is a sweepstakes and has to offer a free way to enter. New York requires registration and a surety bond for the full value of the prize on any pool above $5,000, filed thirty days before launch.

The Federal Trade Commission treats a chance to win as a material connection, so anybody posting about their own entry has to disclose it, and a hashtag on its own does not count. The Commission settled with Publishers Clearing House for $18,500,000 in June 2023 over designs that made people believe buying something improved their odds.

In the United Kingdom the CAP code covers every prize promotion, whether it turns on skill or on chance.

A contest of skill among vetted, contracted ambassadors avoids most of this. An open draw among strangers does not, which is a good reason to keep the internal contest and the public spectacle separate.

The FTC and Publishers Clearing House

An $18,500,000 settlement in June 2023

  • Over designs that made people believe buying something improved their odds
  • A chance to win is a material connection, so an entrant posting about their own entry has to disclose it, and a hashtag on its own does not count
  • New York wants registration and a surety bond on any prize pool above $5,000

ftc.gov

How sure we are: The Commission's own press release.

A prize can lower the effort it was meant to buy

A long line of experiments on paying people for something they did willingly keeps finding that an expected reward reduces their appetite for the task itself. Leaderboards work the same way: published work on rank comparison reports that only the people near the top read a leaderboard as success, and everybody else reads it as losing again.

I have summaries of that literature, not the papers, so treat it as a direction to check before building a leaderboard, not a citation.

The arithmetic of one winner

Doritos cut thousands of entries to 25 and then to one. Lay's took more than 700,000 submissions and paid three people. Every entrant did the work and the brand keeps the entries.

That is fine with strangers. Run it on your own hundred ambassadors and ninety nine of them worked for a prize they did not get, and you face those ninety nine again next month.

An open contest hands the pen to strangers

Mountain Dew ran an open naming contest in 2012 and 4chan took it over, voting an offensive name to the top and leaving a prank on the site. The company pulled the whole thing. It was a consumer contest, not a creator one, and it is why the vetted internal version and the open public version should never share a mechanism.

Mountain Dew, Dub the Dew

An open naming contest taken over by 4chan in 2012

  • An offensive name was voted to the top and a prank was left on the site
  • The company pulled the whole thing
  • A consumer contest, not a creator one

mountaindew.com

How sure we are: Widely reported at the time.

Crash the Super Bowl is not a cautionary tale

It ran for ten years, ended in 2016, and came back in 2025. The gap was a deliberate move to a year round creator programme, not a collapse, so the ending is no proof that contests fail.

What this means for us

The version worth copying is the third, the contest inside a roster a brand already has. It is the cheapest of the three, the only one with no real registration or bonding problem, and the only one where the brand still has the people afterwards.

The pitch comes off the table above. A brand thinking about a competition is thinking about content, and our data says the brands behind the most famous competitions have almost no standing relationships to show for it, while the two running application cohorts book more than half their creators a second time. So the question for a brand is not whether to run a contest, but who would still be here in a year.

Dennis, the gap I could not close is the internal contest, the only one of the three that matters to us. Brands keep those numbers, so all that is public is vendor sales pages. To settle it, ask two or three brands we already speak to what their ambassador leaderboard did to repeat purchase. They can answer that off their own dashboard, and nobody has published it.

Two related pieces: Where influencers actually gather maps about 90 rooms creators are already in, split by whether each holds talent or buyers, the other side of this question. Creative competitions shortlist covers competitions we could enter for social proof, a different subject with the same word.

Facebook, in depth

Creators talking about the business of being creators

This is the tier that matters most to us. These are people who already take money for content.

Group Members Note
The Content Creator Community 55,000 Paid. Video and business skills
Instagram Creators 45,000 Reels focused
UGC Creators Community 15,000 Portfolios, collaboration, brand chat
Short Form Creators 15,000 Reels, Shorts and TikTok
UGC Brand Deals 12,000 Opportunities, rates, and vetting which clients actually pay
Influencers and UGC Creators Not published Exactly what the name says
Collaborations Influencer Network Not published Collaboration matching

The craft groups, where the skill lives

Not business groups, but full of people who make things for a living and are easier to reach than a creator with a manager.

Group Members
CapCut Editors 90,000
Video Editors 80,000
Fashion and Modeling 40,000
Animators Assemble 32,000
3D Animators Community 15,000
Makeup Artists Forum 12,000

The blogger networks, older and underrated

The blogging world built this playbook first and its groups are still running. These people have email lists, which almost no new creator does.

Group Members
SITS Girls About 15,000
Bloggers United 12,000
Inspired Bloggers Network 11,000
BlogHer 6,000
Substack Writers 5,000

The audience groups, which is the idea most people miss

Our own data says a greens powder buys travel and lifestyle channels far more than it buys health channels. Across AG1's placements, travel is 17 percent and lifestyle nearly 25 percent, while health is 8.2 percent. So the creators a wellness brand actually wants are sitting in travel and outdoor communities, not in supplement ones.

These are not creator groups. They are where the creators live.

Group Members Why it is on this list
Girls Love Travel 1,200,000 The biggest women's travel community anywhere
Women Who Hike 600,000 Outdoor, female, heavily photographed
Van Life 500,000 Van life is a content category before it is a lifestyle
Calisthenics and Body Weight Training 483,000 Fitness creators who film everything
Women Who Travel 151,000 Travel, female
Van Life Women 130,000 Narrower and more engaged than the big one
Global Yoga Community 96,000 Wellness adjacent, highly visual
Van Life Europe 80,000 Useful if a brand wants Europe
Wanderful 45,000 Women's travel, runs real events
Skin Care Beauty Products 32,000 Beauty buyers and beauty creators mixed
Anti Aging, Biohacking and Longevity 25,000 The exact audience a supplement brand wants
BioHackers GLOBAL 18,000 Same, smaller and more serious

Marketer-side, where our buyers are

Group Members Who is in it
Affiliate Marketing Worldwide 324,000 Affiliate and performance people
Affiliate Marketing 165,000 Same trade, second big room
Learn Digital Marketing and Affiliate Marketing 100,000 Broad, more junior
SEO Signals Lab 73,000 Serious SEO people, many agency side
Social Media Managers 51,000 The person who actually briefs a creator campaign
The Proper SEO Group 42,000 Agency and consultant heavy
Affiliate Marketing Ninjas 32,000 Performance marketers
Social Marketers' Exchange 10,000 Smaller, more senior
Instagram Marketing Mastermind Not published Instagram buyers

Reddit, in depth

Reddit is the most searchable of the lot, which matters because you can read years of history before you ever post.

Subreddit Members What it is
r/YouTube 3,500,000 Everything YouTube, mostly noise
r/NewTubers 722,000 Small creators. Enormous, mostly beginners
r/videography 455,000 Video and cinema professionals
r/PartneredYouTube 186,000 All monetised, so a pre-filtered talent pool
r/InfluencerMarketing 141,000 Both sides of the table, which is what makes it useful
r/Twitch_Startup 123,000 New streamers
r/streaming 105,000 Live creators across platforms
r/ContentCreators 87,000 Multi-platform general
r/vtubers 87,000 Virtual creators, a real and paid category
r/UGCcreators 85,000 The only large one that openly invites agencies to post work
r/SmallStreamers 47,000 Growth and stream management
r/TikTokRise 35,000 TikTok growth
r/ContentCreation 30,000 Skills rather than business
r/TwitchStreaming 23,000 Technical
r/Creator 11,000 Invite only. Established YouTube and Twitch people
r/Pinterestmarketing 10,000 Narrow, but they buy content

Discord, in depth

Discord is where the younger and more technical creators are, and where a tool company's community doubles as a talent pool.

Server Members What it is
OBS Community 250,000 Streaming software. Vast and technical
StreamScheme 69,000 Stream growth
YouTube Product Community 53,000 Creators and YouTube's own staff in one room
TikTok Discord 50,000 TikTok creators and fans
Instagram Discord 37,000 Instagram creators and photographers
TubeBuddy Discord 35,000 Serious enough to pay for tools
Content Creators Cabin 35,000 Multi-platform, growth focused
Roblox UGC Community 32,000 A real economy, often overlooked
vidIQ Discord 20,000 Same logic as TubeBuddy
Nerd or Die 14,000 Streamers across three platforms
Streamer Hub 11,000 Gaming and entertainment
Gaming Careers 11,000 Career focused
The Collective 2.0 6,000 Paid. TikTok monetisation without ads
Creators Universe 2,000 Cross-platform feedback
Creative Brew 2,000 Artistically mixed, collaborative

Slack, where the buyers are

Slack skews professional and brand side. Two matter.

Community Members Note
Online Geniuses 53,000 The biggest and oldest marketing Slack. SEO consultants, agency owners, ecommerce, growth. Job posts, AMAs, events
Superpath 22,000 Paid. Content marketing specifically, senior, with a job board and member matching

Skool and the paid communities

Skool became the default paid-community platform after Alex Hormozi invested and pushed it hard, which brought scale and also brought a lot of hustle-culture noise. Read the free ones before paying for anything.

Community Members Note
InstaLab 54,000 Free. Instagram for business
SWC 2.0 The Level Up 33,000 Free. General content creation
YT Profit School 20,000 Free. YouTube
Social Creator Club Lite 17,000 Free
Ads For Coaches 10,000 Free
UGC Community 125 Paid. Women scaling UGC to ten thousand a month

How to run it, step by step

The 4 steps, short version

For warming them up, I would just include getting the ones that you already have.

So whether they're affiliates, whether they're customers, whatever, those are the main ones. Tools like Outer Radar to find them, scraping tagged posts on Instagram, and lots of other mechanisms.

So if we break it down into first steps, the first step is to warm them up. So that's doing seeding, PR boxes, outreach to get familiar with additional faces or TikTok affiliates. There are always ways to do contests.

The second is actually bringing them into the community with a deal for the ones that are approved. Then third is running the community, and fourth is then whitelisting, which puts gas on the fire.

  • If we break it down into two jobs, the community's first job is to attract new creators.
  • Then the second job is to give them a reason to stay and continue to work with the brand.

Step 1: Warm creators up before you ask for anything

  • Once this step is done, you have creators who know and like you before you make them an offer.

1.1 · Start with the creators and customers you have

  • Your first ambassadors can be the customers, fans and staff you already have.

Finding your 'tribe' or nano-influencers leads to closer customer relationships and community feedback.

““ But then as we became a larger energy and focus brand that could go up against the Red Bulls and the monsters and rock stars of the world, we realized like I'm not trying to be a rock star, you know, or I don't want to be locked into 5 hours of energy when I'm stepping into like a meeting or just trying to do something. I'm just trying to get mentally sharp. And that's what we realize is the path that we could really play in because a lot of people want that. So if you find your nano influencers, your tribe, how people interact, you're closer with your customer because that's the community you're building and your community is giving you feedback, man. Especially if you're just starting your company, like don't worry about the revenue, you know, worry about like this is how my consumer interacts and that's how you can get really deep. There's a great tool in my life like name drop tools and stuff. ””

1.2 · Send a PR box with a community invite

  • If you've done a good job with the PR boxes and you have good brand association, you will get a lot of influencers who want to join the community.
A creator's own unboxing of a SugarBearHair PR box: vitamin bottles, a hair brush and a detangling-brush box, captioned “you won't believe what sugar bear sent me”
a SugarBearHair PR box from a creator's unboxing: two vitamin bottles, a Batana Oil Hair and Scalp box, a wooden brush and a dropper bottle

1.3 · Gift every week, at a set number

  • Automated gifting lets a small team reach hundreds of creators every week.
    • Grüns: about 2 hours a week reaching 500 TikTok and Instagram creators and 150 YouTube creators, through automated gifting. From Archive's page on Grüns.
    • Spacegoods: a lookalike search off its best paid creators finds 100+ similar creators in minutes (vendor's own numbers). From the vendor's own write-up on Spacegoods.
@bossfidence's paid Instagram post for Grüns, the product in hand
@bossfidence's paid Instagram post for Grüns, the product in hand

1.4 · Put your best early creators on a retainer

1.5 · Once you have a base, stop cold outreach

  • NeuroGum: it pulls from TikTok Affiliate Partner groups and other creator groups instead of cold outreach. From Open Residency, June 2025.
@allymisslove's paid Instagram post for Nutrafol, the product in hand
  • How Nutrafol plans it, in a job post: the hire keeps relationships with creators, talent agencies and platform partners like GRIN, LTK and ShopMy to grow the network.
  • From Nutrafol's job post on Built In.

Step 1 · Where it goes wrong

  • Don't hire a vetted TikTok agency partner, because you're not building a relationship with the influencer.

Step 2: Set the deal structure

OLIPOP's own bar: at least 10,000 followers on one platform, marked

Pick for fit, not size: Gymshark has no fixed checklist for its athletes, and picks them on content quality, brand fit and how their audience responds. Gymshark

Seed made creators pass a course and an exam before they could promote it

  • Seed launched Seed University, a 59-minute Instagram Stories curriculum covering six subjects that prospective ambassadors had to complete and pass a 10-question final exam on before joining its influencer network. glossy.co
  • Once vetted, Seed ambassadors received a 15% base commission for being part of the Seed network, plus 100% of the profits from product sales if they were not part of any other larger influencer network. glossy.co
  • Nearly 1,700 people had registered for Seed University against Seed's more than 36,000 brand Instagram followers, and the brand planned to accept 100 to 200 influencers on a rolling basis. glossy.co

2.1 · Set an open commission, more for your own

Nutrafol's affiliate terms: $40 to $200 per new customer, marked
a creator's paid Instagram post for OLIPOP, the product in hand

2.2 · Write down the monthly quota and who stays

Goli's own reward campaign terms: “to qualify to use GMV for past months, you must post 20 new videos in April”
Force Factor's terms: rewards only for verified Discord members, marked

2.3 · Add a reward ladder, top tier earned

Force Factor's own January 2026 GMV Challenge payout ladder on Growi, marked at both ends: $120.00 bonus at $1,000 GMV and $15,350.00 bonus at $100,000 GMV
IM8's ambassador tiers at 1, 20, 75 and 300 orders

2.4 · Financial incentives are just the starting point

  • Influencers are not limited to financial incentives only.
    • e.l.f.: a TikTok audition called Eyes. Lips. Famous., and 3 winners each got a $5,000 contract and a year of product. From e.l.f.'s own press release, August 2020.
    • IM8: invites to its events, masterclasses and workshops, on top of free product, merch and 10% on every new customer order. From IM8's ambassador page.
    • Ghost: a different fan every week as its legend of the week, instead of its biggest named creators. From PricePlow, June 2020.
    • What the Zoom is: IM8 says people on its 90-day subscription get exclusive access to its scientific advisors and performance coaches, like a quarterly group Zoom with Dr.
    • Dom D'Agostino and access to Bobby Rich, David Beckham's trainer.
    • From Foundr, April 2026.
    • IM8 gives it to its subscribers; you can give the same access to your top tier.
    • From Foundr, April 2026.
    • Nutrafol: passing its Academy earns a creator an accreditation badge to show their audience. From Nutrafol's own Academy page, April 2026.
    • Ketone-IQ: its own Team page names Mitchell Hooper, Truett Hanes and Ryan Collins as partner athletes. From Ketone-IQ's Team page.
e.l.f. Beauty's own press grid of its named brand ambassadors
an IM8-branded outdoor workout class in Miami, part of the brand's own ambassador events

2.5 · Keep the biggest rewards scarce, let trips grow

  • Keep the top prizes for a few, and let trips grow as the group does.
    • NeuroGum: only 10 top creators go on a trip, prizes like a Rolex, and only 3 were on billboards in Miami or Times Square. From Open Residency, June 2025.
    • Revolve: its trips ran from five or six people to a month in the Hamptons with about 70 influencers, 12 a weekend. From Lewis Howes, 2018.
    • Its Coachella trip started in 2010 with two influencer friends renting a house together, and grew to close to 500 influencers.
    • From Lewis Howes, 2018, 25:09.
Revolve Festival's gifting suite
Revolve Festival: four creators posing at the brand-built Revolve structure at Coachella

What they pay and the terms

  • Pay them on every sale: In 2019 Seed offered its vetted ambassadors a 15% base commission, and all of the profit on their sales if they belonged to no bigger network. Glossy, July 2019
    • Amazon pays influencers a commission on every sale their pick brings in, with Amazon Games titles earning the most at 20%. CNBC, June 2022
  • Give them reasons to stay: In 2023 Lululemon's Creator Network asked for at least 3,000 followers on one channel, and gave creators commission, early access to new products and events. WWD, June 2023
    • Glossier started paying its most engaged customers a sales commission, and brought them into special events. Quartz, November 2016
  1. A system must be created where people are truly incentivized to create good content, otherwise they will just hover around.

    “ And what we realize that a lot of these companies start to do is like because they're so desperate to try to get these creators, they would be doing sampling like here and there and then realize that most people are just there to get free stuff. You know, you could very easily run a very unprofitable Tik Tok business by just giving samples away to a million creators. So, unless you create a system where people are truly incentivized to create good content for you, most people are just going to be hovering around. And and that's like with anything in life, right? Like, if you're not incentivized to do great things in life, why would you even do it? ”

  2. The lead gen product on TikTok can be used to drive communication through creators to the rest of the portfolio.

    “ What are the products that we want to push forward because we know that we're going to get incremental profitability on it versus the ones that we know aren't going to ever make profitability on Tik Tok. We just completely killed them. I think all these brands are trying to push everything they can on Tik Tok. Use Tik Tok as like an Amazon style marketplace. And that's not the case anymore. You need to be very specific about what products are going to work, what products are going to be the rotisserie chicken at Costco, you know, the lead gen product. So you could then drive communication through your creators, through everything else to uh the rest of your portfolio. ”

  3. Clicking into a live on TikTok places you within that company's retargeting algorithm, increasing your visibility on their feed.

    “ We decided not to cut out lives at all and instead we like doubled down on it and we even built a studio here in Las Vegas to do all of our lives and we're trying to go longer. Lives are the most authentic way that you could interact with a consumer because it's not cutting, it's not editing, it is you in the moment. People are chatting with you and it's you being able to talk to them directly. And also on Tik Tok, if you click into a live, this is more of a technical thing, but if you are doing a live and someone clicks into it, you are now part of that company's retargeting algorithm. So you will start showing up way more on that person's feed if they decide to click into your live. So concurrent viewers become really, really okay. Important. ”

Step 2 · Where it goes wrong

  • Creators stay only if they make money: Kent says so on Mina Elias, and so does NeuroGum's chief commercial officer on the DTC Podcast.
    • Cineshree Media: free samples without rewards attract freebie seekers and can sink a TikTok business. From Cineshree Media, April 2026.

Step 3: Keep the community active

3.1 · Have dedicated community managers

  • Put named people from your own team inside the creator room.
NeuroGum's Kent Yoshimura inside its creator Discord
1st Phorm's Legionnaire program training together in person at a branded gym class

He keeps Super Room because they are influencer experts he does not have, even though he could build the function himself.

““ There's a difference between who's producing and who's who's strategizing. And I think yeah, more of the strategy in-house the the agency is temporarily. I think the one that will definitely be, you know, Super Room just cuz they're like influencer experts and like I think they they give us a ton that we don't, you know, have and we could build it, but you know, it's currently working very well. But I think on the other side, yeah, our our two not to get into it too much, but like our two like real real big rock things are like having a we'll call it like a Discord, whatever it is, like a community of creators that that you just have a deal with. ””

3.2 · Make sure the brief is very simple, because the longer it is, the higher the chance they won't pay attention to the parts that you want.

The brief and the content

  1. In the early days, the focus was on what hooks worked, being in the trenches together, and making content daily as a New Year's resolution.

    “ So, walk me through like especially in those early days where you just started working with other content creators. Like you did this from like a pretty early stage, right? Yeah, pretty early stage, you know, it all started with like what hooks work for us, like let's be in the trenches together. Let's make content every single day as our New Year's resolution. ”

  2. Sharing hooks with content creators and seeing what works and what doesn't is crucial.

    “ Oh, yeah. Absolutely. And seeing what works and what doesn't. Like even the orientation, I would show up on Zoom calls with them once a quarter and, you know, talk to our top creators. If there's no personal relationship that you're building or or even like a personal brand relationship you're building, these creators are just going to say whatever they want, right? Of course, because you're not guiding them. And in the same way, if you're not having that open dialogue, they're not going to come back to you and communicate with you on what's working, what's not, I'm getting this violation for this, I'm getting. ”

  3. Without a personal relationship, creators may say whatever they want because they are not being guided.

    “ And seeing what works and what doesn't. Like even the orientation, I would show up on Zoom calls with them once a quarter and, you know, talk to our top creators. If there's no personal relationship that you're building or or even like a personal brand relationship you're building, these creators are just going to say whatever they want, right? Of course, because you're not guiding them. And in the same way, if you're not having that open dialogue, they're not going to come back to you and communicate with you on what's working, what's not, I'm getting this violation for this, I'm getting. And I think the key word here is relationship. ”

They are building a TikTok and IG trend dashboard with an agency so retained creators can see what is popping and go make five videos.

““ I would rather give them strategy up front, give them like like let's do the research, give them strategy, and they're coached, they know what makes a good ad, they know what makes a good post, like they know about the brand, and then they just create, and then it's just like every week they're just boom, here's five assets, here's whatever it is. Um that's the goal. So we're working with an agency right now to build out like an organic TikTok and IG real like trend dashboard, so we can just see what's trending in you know, our space relative to other stuff, and they can literally just see that, and they're on retainer, and they can just be like, all right, cool, redness is popping off, here are the top five organic videos in redness. I'm going to go make five, and we'll just get them uploaded that week. ””

3.3 · Ensure that not only the community managers but also high-level C-suite founders get access to meet the creators, and meet them often.

3.4 · Now, for the creators that are growing, make sure that they level up and have perks. Don't focus on the size; focus on growth, not only in how they are promoting your brand, but also in their own growth.

  • Move your most promising creators into a smaller group that is harder to join.
    • goPure: a creator posting 5 videos a month who shows promise goes into a Discord or Slack chat, with incentives to get to 20. From goPure on Instant's podcast.
    • Sephora: Sephora Squad is a paid year-long cohort you apply to, with 30,000 applications in 2021, running 8 years. From the Sephora Squad page.
a Sephora Squad member's own brand-trip vlog: a Sephora gift bag, branded swag bags and a SQUAD dinner table

3.5 · A lot of the time, once you start building intimacy, and if the community actually has the right channels and it's actually interesting, then you'll be in a position where you can start collaborating with creators on product launches and events.

  • Your creators can tell you what to make next, before it launches.
    • Ulta Beauty: creators in the Ulta Beauty Collective feed insight back, "almost like a kind of a mini advisory panel". From CreatorIQ, March 2021.
    • Califia Farms: it works with its ambassadors every month, gets their feedback on all its products, and sends products before they hit the market. From 33voices, August 2016.
    • Hexclad: its Cooking with Hexclad Facebook group gets early access, so its best customers' reviews are on the product page at launch. From Marketing Operators, May 2024.
    • Mutant Nation: at the Olympia, Mutant asked Mutant Nation what formulas it wanted, and a couple of formulas came from its asks. From Bodybuilding Today, May 2016.
Ulta Beauty Collective's own ski week: a Milk Makeup tote and a creator posing on the snow

city by city domination

  • Invite creators who can come: Beyond Yoga opened a pop-up in New York's Flatiron District and had movement classes led by local favorites Ali Brunson, Jada Covington and DanceBody founder Katia Pryce. WWD, September 2026
  • Build the room so it films: Tatcha built its first pop-up's meditation room, wishing tree and on-site haikus, invited influencers to create content there, and saw over 9 million social media impressions. Glossy, March 2023
  • Test the city with a pop-up: In October 2024 Rhode opened its first London pop-up for just four days, and TikTok videos posted from it that day reached millions of views. Refinery29, October 2024
  • Skims opened its first European pop-up at Selfridges London, while planning its own UK and EU stores within 3 years. Retail Bulletin, June 2023
  • Get sign ups before opening: A year later, before its Sephora UK opening, Rhode said it had the most customer sign ups of any brand launch at Sephora UK. WWD, October 2025
  • Host local creators on launch day: On launch day Hailey Bieber hosted British influencers and beauty editors at a London dinner, with guests like Jessica Diner and Rochelle Humes. Desiree Design, November 2025

Step 3 · Where it goes wrong

  • Without a personal relationship, creators may say whatever they want because they are not being guided.

Step 4: Now, from there, this is the most important part, and it's to actually take all that goodwill and now turn it into posts, deals and ad rights

  • Once this step is done, you get a steady flow of posts, countable sales, and videos to run as ads.

4.1 · Sample big at launch, then 20 to 30%

a creator with the Grüns bag she was sent, in her paid post

4.2 · Pay more once they post, reward posting too

  • Our entire goal is to make influencers love your brand so much they're posting without even paying. And sure, you might have to pay a retainer. You might have to pay some lower fees, but all in all, it shouldn't have to be like, "I pay you $20,000 every time I want to make one 30-second integration."
    • The standard way of influencer marketing is I pay $10,000 per video.
two creator emails from our inbox: a flat fee offer next to an affiliate link, and what that link sold
  • Reward the posting itself, with a climbing commission, points or more product.
a creator's paid Instagram post for OLIPOP, the product in hand
an Olipop campus ambassador sampling event in a lecture hall, with a sign-up survey for a $500 gift card

4.3 · Great little tip, by the way, especially for UGC for Meta ads: get loads of it inside your affiliate program from very small creators who are purely getting commission. You can have a clause which just allows you to post and use it if they in fact make anything with the seeded content.

4.4 · Count every video and every sale

Archive's own case study page on Grüns, its Results stat panel (650+ influencers managed, 1 hour a week, 1,500 UGC assets tracked) and the Grüns logo
Archive's own case study page on Grüns, the line 'Just four months after launching to the world, Grüns had already tracked 1,500 UGC assets in Archive' highlighted

4.5 · Use the community posts to now acquire larger deals. This creates the flywheel.

  • Show the posts to retail buyers, and grow your best creators into bigger roles.

Step 4 · Where it goes wrong

  • Plan for the videos to become ads, or the work stops at the post.
    • Grüns: its pipeline stopped when creators published, and turning the videos into edited ads stayed slow and manual. From Archive's page on Grüns.
    • Roughly, brands would actually spend 10% of the budget on organic creator marketing, which includes the community's expenses, and then 90% towards amplifying it through paid ads.

Nutrafol trains every partner before they post

Nutrafol Academy is a creator and influencer accreditation programme led by Nutrafol's Chief Medical Advisor, Dr. Heather Woolery-Lloyd. Participants earn an accreditation badge, and all partners are required to complete the courses. [1]

Nutrafol’s own Academy says all brand partners must complete its courses, while a hiring brief describes an always-on programme designed to scale Instagram, TikTok and YouTube creators who bring in sales against acquisition, ROAS and CPA. [1] [3] This is an uncommon pairing in wellness: compliance and scientific fluency on one side; performance optimisation and creator-volume management on the other.

The 2024 More to Hair campaign demonstrates the same system without a named creator at its centre. It used short films on YouTube, television, Instagram and TikTok to surface unexpected hair-health triggers.

How IM8 runs its creator community

IM8 gets creators into a room, gives them something to post, and brings its product into rooms other people already fill.

The groups IM8 runs

  • IM8 picked its first 12 affiliates by hand. One of them did a 30-day social media challenge and went to her first few IM8 events in New York, and other creators tag #IM8Challenge.
  • New ambassadors get a welcome box. It holds product, and in one case an IM8 sweater, and they post the unboxing with their own code and #IM8Ambassador.
  • The IM8 Strava club had 4,155 members on 12 September 2026. Almost 200,000 people joined its challenge with Inter Miami CF, where moving 120 minutes earned a one-time $50 code.
  • Creators who do not want to sell can make videos instead. IM8 sends free product, they make 2 videos within 14 days, and the ones whose videos do well over a 30-day test are invited into its Creator Directory for paid work.

Sources: a founding affiliate's post, an ambassador's unboxing, the IM8 Strava club, IM8's UGC creator page.

The events IM8 ran or backed

  • A launch day in New York, 14 January 2025. David Beckham, Deepak Chopra and IM8's science advisers in front of press, with Chopra leading a meditation.
  • IM8 Vibrante in Miami, April 2025. An evening of talks with David Beckham at the Faena Theater for about 150 creators, experts and press.
  • Power Sessions with PURE Group in Hong Kong, January and February 2026. Trial classes in yoga, Pilates, FUZE and dance, each with an IM8 smoothie from the gym group's own cafe, nood food. A coach's post shows the classes still running in late August.
  • A panel at the ELEVATE Wellness Summit in London, June 2026. Billed as powered by IM8, with its ambassador Tina Lond-Caulk speaking and product in the VIP gift bags.
  • The Champion's Mile in London, 30 June 2026. A mile run hosted by Ironman world champion Lucy Charles-Barclay and Rose Harvey, booked through the Strava club.
  • A creator afternoon at Flyfish Club in New York, 26 August 2026. A talk on sleep, supplements and longevity, and a gift box to take home.
  • A drinks station at Lore Bathing Club in New York, 29 August 2026. IM8 served drinks from 12pm to 3pm during sauna sessions.
  • A morning at NÔMADE Temple in Ibiza, late August 2026. Yoga, sound healing and an ice bath, with an IM8 welcome pack.
  • Gift bags at talk evenings. IM8 product went into the bags at the Lipedema Summit, Lessons in Longevity in Windsor and The Longevity Series.

Sources: the US launch release, the Vibrante release, PURE Yoga, the FUZE coach, ELEVATE, the Strava club, Flyfish Club, Lore Bathing Club, NÔMADE Temple, Lipedema Summit, Lessons in Longevity, The Longevity Series.

Most of these cost IM8 one small thing, a smoothie, a drinks station or a gift bag, in a room somebody else already filled.

Other brands doing the same

  • Celsius at SoulCycle. 20 branded rides as SoulCycle's energy drink partner.
  • LYMA at SoulCycle's The Barn. A Wellness Weekend with a branded bar and gifts on the bikes for 1,500 riders.
  • Lemme at solidcore. A studio takeover for its creatine gummy launch.
  • Whoop at Diplo's Run Club. 5K runs with a Diplo set after, at the New York and Miami stops.
  • Puresport with Represent 247. A 500+ person run club to launch a joint clothing range.
  • AG1 in Asia. A marathon sponsorship, run club events and an expo, with 10,000 samples, by its agency's own count.
  • Athletic Brewing at Boulderthon. A free can for every runner at the after-party.
  • Nuun at Orangetheory. The preferred hydration partner in the studios, rather than one event.

Sources: Athletech News, The Industry Beauty, WWD, Whoop, Represent, Mongoose's write-up, Boulderthon, PR Newswire.

How many people you reach

How many people you reach, by what you do

One video from the biggest running creator reaches more people than 10 run clubs posting about you.

The biggest running creator hydration brands have paid is Michelle Khare. This is the Liquid I.V. read:

Each answer is the number of people who actually see it. From 5 times on it is a range, because the same person can see it in two places.

What you do Once 5 times 10 times
Pay a running creator for one video 1.4 million 1.8 million to 2.2 million 2 million to 2.5 million
Get a run club to post about you 3,100 to 5,000 7,100 to 18,000 8,600 to 23,000
Post in an online community that lets you 4,000 to 19,000 only 1 with a size -
Exhibit at a trade show 400 to 1,300 all 3 with a size: 510 to 2,100 -
How the ranges are worked out

The high end adds every place up in full and takes the best published share who see it. The low end counts the biggest place whole and only 50% of every other place, because some of their audience was already reached, then takes the worst share.

The 50% already reached is our judgement. No page publishes how many followers of one run club also follow another, or how many people watch two running creators. Half is deliberately heavy, because every audience here is the same kind of person.

Some places cannot be counted at all. Every Reddit room removes promotion, so a post there reaches nobody for long. Affiliate networks like ClickBank take an offer, not a post, so their member count is a count of affiliates, not an audience.

Pay a running creator for one video

People who see it = views of one video. Hardly anybody watches the same sponsored video twice.

LMNT paid Makari Espe and Isaiah Photo, numbers 4 and 5 on the list:

The 10 biggest running creators hydration brands have paid

# Creator Views of one video Added up
1 Michelle Khare 1,446,198 1,446,198
2 Nick Bare 218,929 1,665,127
3 Noah Anderson 194,300 1,859,427
4 Makari Espe 162,283 2,021,710
5 Isaiah Photo 151,130 2,172,840
6 Truett Hanes 78,043 2,250,883
7 Nico Felich 61,933 2,312,816
8 BuzzAlong 55,914 2,368,730
9 Floris Gierman 55,559 2,424,289
10 Allie Ostrander 55,311 2,479,600
The sum, step by step
Step 1 creator 5 creators 10 creators
1. Views of one video, every creator added up 1,446,198 2,172,840 2,479,600
2. The biggest creator, counted whole 1,446,198 1,446,198 1,446,198
3. Every other creator, added up 0 726,642 1,033,402
4. The half of row 3 not already reached 0 363,321 516,701
5. Audience at the low end: row 2 plus row 4 1,446,198 1,809,519 1,962,899
All 44 running creators with a view count, and who paid them
# Creator Views of one video Brands that paid them
1 Michelle Khare 1,446,198 Liquid I.V.
2 Nick Bare 218,929 Bare Performance Nutrition
3 Noah Anderson 194,300 Transparent Labs
4 Makari Espe 162,283 LMNT
5 Isaiah Photo 151,130 LMNT
6 Truett Hanes 78,043 LMNT, Transparent Labs
7 Nico Felich 61,933 Bare Performance Nutrition
8 BuzzAlong 55,914 Precision Fuel and Hydration
9 Floris Gierman 55,559 LMNT, Precision Fuel and Hydration
10 Allie Ostrander 55,311 Kion, LMNT
11 Sweat Elite 52,259 Precision Fuel and Hydration
12 Mica Rivera Wood 51,541 LMNT, Transparent Labs
13 NorCal Cycling 51,266 LMNT, Momentous
14 IRONMAN Triathlon 49,259 Precision Fuel and Hydration
15 Adam Wood 46,259 LMNT
16 kofuzi 40,205 Skratch Labs
17 TRACK: All-Access 40,188 LMNT, Momentous
18 SYD and MACKY 36,576 Skratch Labs
19 Singletrack 29,603 Precision Fuel and Hydration
20 WEDŪ 29,293 BUBS Naturals, DripDrop
21 Lucy Davis Fit 28,205 Bare Performance Nutrition
22 Floberg Runs 26,888 Bare Performance Nutrition
23 Jake Dearden 26,426 Bare Performance Nutrition
24 Kaleigh Cohen Cycling 26,181 LMNT
25 Kris Hui 25,318 LMNT, Transparent Labs
26 Cody Miller 23,461 Jocko Fuel, LMNT
27 Nathan French 22,369 Bare Performance Nutrition
28 Marathon Handbook 19,694 Momentous
29 Worldwide Cyclery 17,206 LMNT
30 DIALED HEALTH 14,216 Bare Performance Nutrition
31 EvanRuns 13,385 Redmond Re-Lyte
32 The Athlete Special 13,376 Kion, LMNT, Momentous
33 Amanda Kimiko 12,220 Bare Performance Nutrition
34 Brock Kelly 11,490 Bare Performance Nutrition
35 Believe in the Run 8,736 LMNT
36 Doctors of Running 7,997 Skratch Labs
37 Jenna & Miguel - Freestyle Tri 7,383 LMNT, Momentous
38 Christine Unfiltered 4,727 Momentous
39 Alison Williams Morris 3,725 Paleovalley
40 StrengthRunning 3,632 LMNT
41 Keira McVitty 3,296 Precision Fuel and Hydration
42 Jen Lauren 1,602 Thorne
43 Kramer Ammons 1,173 LMNT
44 UltraTrailSteven 1,022 Gnarly Nutrition

Get a run club to post about you

People who see it = the club's Instagram followers x the share who see one post, 4.7% to 7.55%.

Propel already works with run clubs. 6 of the 42 clubs and races we found call themselves Propel partners on Instagram, and 4 of them are among the 10 biggest: Atlanta Run Club, Koreatown Run Club, Ampersand Running Club and Built2Last Run Club.

Koreatown Run Club's Propel Hydration Hub, and Atlanta Run Club's relay with Propel:

Built2Last Run Club's Propel sponsor poster, and Ampersand Running Club's free Propel 5K:

The 10 biggest run clubs and races

# Club Followers Added up
1 @unofficialrunclub 65,662 65,662
2 @atlantarunclub 47,133 112,795
3 @koreatownrunclub 45,554 158,349
4 @zftrunclub_houston 42,776 201,125
5 @lungerunclub 33,528 234,653
6 @ampersandrunningclub 19,949 254,602
7 @lauderdalerunclub 16,315 270,917
8 @bodyartrunclub 12,736 283,653
9 @built2lastrunclub 8,655 292,308
10 @pasadena.runclub 6,341 298,649
Where 4.7% to 7.55% comes from

Socialinsider measured the share of an Instagram account's followers who see one post, by account size. Accounts with 5,000 to 10,000 followers reach 7.55% with a Reel, the best rate at any size a club comes in. Accounts with 50,000 to 100,000 followers reach 4.7% with an image post, the worst.

The 10 biggest clubs have 6,341 to 65,662 followers, so the range runs from that worst rate to that best one.

The sum, step by step
Step 1 club 5 clubs 10 clubs
1. Followers, every club added up 65,662 234,653 298,649
2. The biggest club, counted whole 65,662 65,662 65,662
3. Every other club, added up 0 168,991 232,987
4. The half of row 3 not already reached 0 84,496 116,494
5. Audience at the low end: row 2 plus row 4 65,662 150,158 182,156
6. People who see it, low end: row 5 x 4.7% 3,086 7,057 8,561
7. People who see it, high end: row 1 x 7.55% 4,957 17,716 22,548

Post in an online community that lets you

People who see it = members x the share who see one post, 10% to 47.81%.

# Community Members Added up
1 Startup CPG 40,000 40,000

Startup CPG's members are brand founders and marketers, not runners.

Where 10% to 47.81% comes from

Nobody publishes the share of a community who see one post, so the range sits between two figures that are published. Nielsen Norman Group found 90% of people in an online community only read, 9% take part a little and 1% do nearly all of it, so 10% take part, and people who take part certainly see a post. The top end is the share of a health and fitness email list who open an email, 47.81% in the MailerLite benchmarks, because a member of a community also signed up to hear from it.

The sum, step by step
Step 1 community
1. Members 40,000
2. People who see it, low end: row 1 x 10% 4,000
3. People who see it, high end: row 1 x 47.81% 19,124

7 more online rooms let you post but publish no size, so they cannot be counted.

Exhibit at a trade show

People who see it = people attending x the share who stop at any one stand, 10% to 33%.

Health Optimisation Summit London, the biggest show we could count, advertises itself like this:

Show People attending Added up
1 Health Optimisation Summit London 4,000 4,000
2 HOLOLIFE Summit Amsterdam 2,000 6,000
3 Roundtable of Longevity Clinics 250 6,250
Where 10% to 33% comes from

Crestline found that at a show of about 400 stands, an attendee visits less than 10% of them, which is under 40 stands. Health Optimisation Summit London has 120 stands, and 40 stops out of 120 is a third. So the share who stop at any one stand runs between the two, and a good stand lands higher inside that range than a bad one.

The sum, step by step
Step 1 show All 3 shows
1. People attending, every show added up 4,000 6,250
2. The biggest show, counted whole 4,000 4,000
3. Every other show, added up 0 2,250
4. The half of row 3 not already reached 0 1,125
5. Audience at the low end: row 2 plus row 4 4,000 5,125
6. People who see it, low end: row 5 x 10% 400 512
7. People who see it, high end: row 1 x 33% 1,320 2,062

7 more shows let you exhibit but publish no attendance, so they cannot be counted.

Counting down: from every runner in the US

Counted down from every runner in the US, one post from an average running creator reaches 250 to 1,200 people, and one from an average run club reaches 10 to 3,700.

This starts from the 23.3 million Americans who run 50 or more times a year and applies a published share at every step until it gets to one place.

Each place is the average one: every runner in that kind of place, shared across how many of those places there are.

Both ways, side by side

What you do From the places we found From every US runner
1 running creator 1.4 million 250 to 1,200
5 running creators 1.8 million to 2.2 million 740 to 5,800
10 running creators 2 million to 2.5 million 1,400 to 12,000
1 run club 3,100 to 5,000 10 to 3,700
5 run clubs 7,100 to 18,000 40 to 19,000
10 run clubs 8,600 to 23,000 70 to 37,000
1 community 4,000 to 19,000 cannot be counted down
5 communities only 1 measured cannot be counted down
10 communities - cannot be counted down
1 stand 400 to 1,300 10 to 40
5 stands only 3 measured: 510 to 2,100 40 to 210
10 stands - 70 to 420
Every step for run clubs

People who see it = core runners x the share who run with a club, shared across the clubs, x the share of members who see one post.

The survey only asked people who enter races, so the share who run with a club may be lower for every core runner. The 1,500 clubs are only the ones in the Road Runners Club of America, so the high end makes each club too big.

Step Low end High end Where it comes from
1. Core US runners 23,300,000 23,300,000 Outdoor Industry Association: 52.3 million ran on a road in 2025, and 29 million of them not often enough to count as core
2. Share who run with a running club 10.1% 49.9% Running USA, 2025, runners who enter races. Low: mostly run with one. High: ever run with one, since 50.1% never do
3. Core runners who run with a club 2,353,300 11,626,700 Row 1 x row 2
4. Running clubs in the US 1,500 1,500 Road Runners Club of America member clubs. More clubs exist, so this is the fewest
5. Runners in one club 133 7,751 Low: the RRCA's 200,000 runners ÷ its 1,500 clubs. High: row 3 ÷ row 4
6. Share of a club's members who see one post 10% 47.81% The community range, explained above
7. People who see it, 1 club 13 3,706 Row 5 x row 6
8. People who see it, 5 clubs 40 18,529 Low: one club whole plus half of 4 more, x 10%. High: 5 clubs added up, x 47.81%
9. People who see it, 10 clubs 73 37,058 Low: one club whole plus half of 9 more, x 10%. High: 10 clubs added up, x 47.81%
Every step for running creators

People who see it = core runners x the share who follow running creators, shared across the creators, x the share of followers who see one post.

The high end does not add the bloggers on top of the elite runners, because one runner follows both. The 534 running creators are only the ones we hold, so the average creator here comes out bigger than a real one.

Step Low end High end Where it comes from
1. Core US runners 23,300,000 23,300,000 Outdoor Industry Association, 2025
2. Share who follow running creators 12% 35% Running USA, 2020. Low: follow running bloggers. High: follow elite runners
3. Core runners who follow running creators 2,796,000 8,155,000 Row 1 x row 2
4. Running creators they are shared across 534 534 Running creators in our creator table. More exist, so this is the fewest
5. Followers of one average creator 5,236 15,272 Row 3 ÷ row 4
6. Share of followers who see one post 4.7% 7.55% Socialinsider, Instagram, explained above under run clubs
7. People who see it, 1 creator 246 1,153 Row 5 x row 6
8. People who see it, 5 creators 738 5,765 Low: one creator whole plus half of 4 more, x 4.7%. High: 5 creators added up, x 7.55%
9. People who see it, 10 creators 1,353 11,530 Low: one creator whole plus half of 9 more, x 4.7%. High: 10 creators added up, x 7.55%
Every step for a stand at a race

People who see it = race registrations shared across the races x the share who stop at any one stand.

A registration is not a person, because one runner enters several races, and the average is taken across every race, big and small.

Step Low end High end Where it comes from
1. Race registrations, 2025 12,200,000 12,200,000 RunSignup
2. Races 97,000 97,000 RunSignup, same year
3. Registrations at one average race 126 126 Row 1 ÷ row 2
4. Share who stop at any one stand 10% 33% The trade show range, explained above
5. People who see it, 1 race 13 42 Row 3 x row 4
6. People who see it, 5 races 38 208 Low: one race whole plus half of 4 more, x 10%. High: 5 races added up, x 33%
7. People who see it, 10 races 69 415 Low: one race whole plus half of 9 more, x 10%. High: 10 races added up, x 33%
Why the two ways come out so far apart
  • The places we found are the biggest ones, so they are the best case. Counting down uses the average place, and the average running creator and the average race are small.
  • A stand means a health trade show in the places we found, where the people are founders and marketers, and a race counting down, where they are runners.
  • For 5 and 10 run clubs, counting down's high end comes out above the places we found. It shares every runner who ever runs with a club across only the 1,500 clubs the RRCA counts, so each club comes out too big.

Counting down cannot get as far as one community. No survey we could find publishes what share of runners sit in an online running group. Every Reddit room on this page removes promotion in any case.

1. The communities

What else the search found

  • No room exists where health creators talk to each other about brand deals. We looked on Skool, Discord, Facebook and Reddit, and a second search from the other direction agreed.
  • The audience is on Reddit and nearly nowhere else. r/Biohackers has 899,785 members. The biggest server under Discord's whole biohacking tag has 1,068.
  • Three famous paid communities are really more to read. Members of Huberman Lab Premium, Peter Attia's premium tier and the base tier of FoundMyFitness cannot reach each other.

Every room, by kind

All six kinds of room side by side
Kind of room Rooms Members, where published Let you promote
Where health creators talk shop 2 114 0 of 2
Rooms the creators run themselves 14 85,260 0 of 14
Sold as a community, actually a content tier 3 not published 0 of 3
Where the buyers are 19 46,250 18 of 19
Where the audience is 24 5,856,880 0 of 24
Networks you join rather than rooms you enter 3 103,000 2 of 3
Where health creators talk shop: 2 rooms, 0 let you promote
Room Who is in it Members Can you promote
GCC Global Creators Club UGC creators making short Amazon product videos 114 Not known
Wellbeing Contributor Community Wellbeing founders and contributors who publish not published Not known
Rooms the creators run themselves: 14 rooms, 0 let you promote
Room Who is in it Members Can you promote
CMJ Masterpass Nutrition-science readers in a forum he answers in 84,000 No
Conquer Aging or Die Trying People tracking their own biomarkers alongside his 1,260 No
Ben Greenfield Life Endurance and biohacking followers in group coaching not published No
Biolayne membership Evidence-first lifters and coaches not published No
Don't Die Blueprint followers meeting in person in cities worldwide not published Not known
Female Longevity Optimization Community Women doing structured biohacking protocols not published No
Forever Strong cohorts Muscle-centric medicine followers inside a paid challenge not published No
Genius Life VIP Brain health and nutrition readers not published No
Hyman Hive Functional medicine followers paying for direct access not published No
Reset Academy Women following her fasting protocol, coached in cohorts not published No
Siim Land Patreon Longevity and metabolic self-experimenters not published No
The Longevity Community Peptide and bioregulator self-experimenters not published No
The Ultimate Human VIP Followers paying for monthly live coaching with Gary Brecka not published No
The Upgrade Collective Biohackers paying for live access to Dave Asprey not published No
Sold as a community, actually a content tier: 3 rooms, 0 let you promote
Room Who is in it Members Can you promote
FoundMyFitness Premium Members in monthly live Q and A with her, plus a $250/month group-call tier not published No
Huberman Lab Premium Subscribers to AMAs and transcripts, who never meet not published No
The Drive Premium Subscribers to his written analysis, who never meet not published No
Where the buyers are: 19 rooms, 18 let you promote
Room Who is in it Members Can you promote
Startup CPG CPG founders and marketers, heavy food, beverage and supplements 40,000 Yes, in the service provider channels only
Health Optimisation Summit London Supplement and device founders, retailers, clinics, investors and creators in one hall 4,000 Yes, as an exhibitor
HOLOLIFE Summit Amsterdam Wellness-tech founders, longevity doctors and business owners 2,000 Yes, exhibitor and partner routes
Roundtable of Longevity Clinics Longevity clinic leaders and MDs, plus their named suppliers 250 Yes, partner tiers
A4M World Congress and LongevityFest Anti-aging and longevity physicians and clinic owners not published Yes, exhibitor prospectus and sponsorships
Amazon FBA supplement seller groups Amazon supplement sellers, small budgets, fast decisions not published Promo day only
BEYOND Biohacking Conference Biohacking brands and vendors around Dave Asprey not published Yes, exhibitor and sponsor
Biohackers World Conference and Expo Biohacking brands on a touring expo floor not published Yes, exhibitor
Expo West and SupplySide West Nearly every supplement marketer physically shows up not published Paid booth or just walk the floor
Fullscript brand partners Supplement brands selling through practitioner dispensaries not published Yes, brand onboarding
Healthy Body Daily Supplement, biohacking and longevity readers not published Yes, category-exclusive sponsorship
IFM Annual International Conference Functional medicine MDs, NPs, chiropractors and nutritionists who prescribe supplements not published Yes, exhibit and sponsor prospectus
Longevity Investors Conference Longevity founders and the investors funding them not published Not known
Longevity Leadership Conference Founders scaling healthspan companies, operators and investors not published Yes, sponsorship
Longevity Summit Dublin Longevity scientists, clinicians, entrepreneurs and investors not published Yes, sponsor portal
Longevity.Technology The longevity trade, daily not published Yes, paid advertising
Naturally Network chapters Supplement and natural products marketers by region not published Partner and sponsor slots, member directories, not cold posting
NutraIngredients USA, Nutritional Outlook, Whole Foods Magazine The same supplement marketer list not published Paid sponsorship, so yes
Supplement manufacturing and private label groups Small supplement brand owners launching a SKU with no marketing team not published Promo day only in most of them
Where the audience is: 24 rooms, 0 let you promote
Room Who is in it Members Can you promote
r/intermittentfasting Fasters, mostly there to lose weight 1,012,869 No
r/Biohackers Self-experimenters 899,785 No
r/Supplements People deciding what to buy this week 612,798 No
r/ketoscience Keto and metabolic health readers 542,495 No
Calisthenics and Body Weight Training Fitness creators who film everything 483,000 Not known
r/Nootropics Cognitive enhancement buyers 450,655 No
r/HubermanLab One podcast's audience 253,484 No
r/Testosterone Men managing hormones, many on TRT 243,109 No
r/longevity Life extension readers 212,642 No
r/Semaglutide GLP-1 users 203,409 No
r/Peptides Peptide users, the sub is NSFW-flagged 172,771 No
r/Biohacking Self-experimenters, the second sub 116,120 No
r/NooTopics A harder-science nootropics splinter 108,824 No
r/carnivorediet Carnivore and animal-based eaters 103,421 No
r/AdvancedFitness Training past the beginner stage 102,634 No
Global Yoga Community Wellness adjacent, highly visual 96,000 Not known
r/PeterAttia One podcast's audience, the affluent end 86,119 No
r/StackAdvice People asking what to buy, by name 64,718 No
r/QuantifiedSelf Wearables and self-tracking 27,247 No
Anti Aging, Biohacking and Longevity The exact audience a supplement brand wants 25,000 Not known
BioHackers GLOBAL Same, smaller and more serious 18,000 Not known
r/SaturatedFat A small, intense diet sub 11,918 No
r/longevity_protocol Protocol followers, Blueprint-style 8,794 No
The Biohacker Lounge DIY-bio, CRISPR and nootropics hobbyists 1,068 Not known
Networks you join rather than rooms you enter: 3 rooms, 2 let you promote
Room Who is in it Members Can you promote
ClickBank Affiliates running supplement and health offers 100,000 Yes, as an offer
HealthTrader Health and wellness publishers only 3,000 Yes, as an offer
Thorne Ambassadors Wellness professionals, trainers and creators not published No

2. The run clubs

Run clubs are real, but each one is small.

The biggest club has 65,662 followers, and only 8 of the 42 clubs and races we found have more than 10,000.

Instagram followers on 2026-09-11. A runner follows several clubs and most followers never turn up, so these do not add up into an audience.
The 20 biggest clubs and races
Club Instagram Followers What it is
U N O F F I C I A L @unofficialrunclub 65,662 Club
Atlanta Run Club ™ @atlantarunclub 47,133 Club
Koreatown Run Club @koreatownrunclub 45,554 Club
ZFT Run Club - Houston @zftrunclub_houston 42,776 Club
Lunge Run Club @lungerunclub 33,528 Club
Ampersand Running Club / Fort Worth, Texas @ampersandrunningclub 19,949 Club
Lauderdale Run Club @lauderdalerunclub 16,315 Club
BODY ART RUN CLUB / BARC @bodyartrunclub 12,736 Club
BUILT2LAST RUN CLUB ATL @built2lastrunclub 8,655 Club
Pasadena Run Club @pasadena.runclub 6,341 Club
Toronto Trail Runners @torontotrailrunners 5,861 Club
Stamford Run Club @stamford.runclub 5,561 Club
Bermondsey Street Runners @bermondsey_street_runners 4,469 Club
QSW RUN CREW @qswruncrew 3,959 Club
Kool Run Club @koolrunclub 3,697 Club
BODY ART RUN CLUB / BARC ATX @bodyartrunclubaustin 3,557 Club
Yes Chef Run Club @yeschefrunclub 3,377 Club
Seconds Run Club @secondsrunclub 2,894 Club
Sunday Social Run Club @sundaysocialrunclub._ 2,811 Club
Buns Run Club @bunsrunclub 2,626 Club

3. The creators

Hydration brands pay for reach, not runners.

The hydration brands on our shelf have paid 897 creators, who get 385 million views a month between them. 45 of those creators run, and they get 1.2% of those views. The biggest creator we know runs, Michelle Khare, is number 73 on the list.

Views a month is views per video times videos a month, from our creator table.

What that looks like: LMNT on Cleetus McFarland, number 1 on the list, and Liquid I.V. on Kill Tony, number 3. Neither one runs.

The 20 biggest creators hydration brands pay
Creator Views a month Sponsor deals Runs
Cleetus McFarland 16,356,838 2 no
Jesse James West 13,321,954 3 no
Kill Tony 11,647,048 6 no
CboysTV 11,373,617 3 no
Rotten Mango 10,688,738 1 no
Ryan Hall, Y'all 9,419,224 7 not checked
Anna McNulty 9,244,063 1 no
Candace Owens 9,089,250 8 no
MURPHYS DIESEL 9,027,713 2 no
Danny Duncan 8,964,388 1 no
ANATOLY 8,731,438 2 no
Will Tennyson 8,268,616 1 no
RocaNews 7,913,549 2 not checked
Cappy Army 7,325,464 4 not checked
Theo Von 5,362,620 17 no
ZHC Crafts 4,343,116 1 no
HeavyDSparks 4,328,091 1 not checked
LegitStreetCars 3,929,473 1 no
Guga Foods 3,701,083 6 no
ThatWasEpic 3,357,153 2 not checked
The 20 biggest health and biohacking creators
Creator Views a month Sponsor deals Why they are here
Andrew Huberman 1,791,588 20 runs Huberman Lab Premium
Renaissance Periodization 1,321,795 2 on the biohacking shelf
FoundMyFitness Clips 479,237 3 on the biohacking shelf
Dr. Suneel Dhand 322,443 2 on the biohacking shelf
Jesse Chappus 203,725 17 on the biohacking shelf
Paul Saladino MD 179,491 3 on the biohacking shelf
Dr. Layne Norton 137,130 0 runs Biolayne membership
Siim Land 111,673 28 runs Siim Land Patreon
Hink 105,284 24 on the biohacking shelf
Cipri Kaiser 88,380 0 on the biohacking shelf
Peter Attia MD 85,980 0 runs The Drive Premium
Patrick recherchiert 82,520 0 on the biohacking shelf
Dr. Gabrielle Lyon 78,762 41 runs Forever Strong cohorts
Mic the Vegan 76,059 48 on the biohacking shelf
Shawn Baker MD 65,927 8 on the biohacking shelf
Fitness Food Corner 64,706 0 on the biohacking shelf
Dave Asprey 58,480 186 runs The Upgrade Collective
FoundMyFitness 57,146 1 runs FoundMyFitness Premium
Dr. Fuhrman 41,738 0 on the biohacking shelf
Dave Feldman 38,340 5 on the biohacking shelf

4. How much of the audience you could reach

All the creators they pay: 16.5 views a month per core runner. The ones who run: 0.2.

A core runner runs 50 or more times a year, and there are 23.3 million of them in the US. Share out the monthly views of every creator the hydration brands pay and each core runner would see 16.5, if every view landed on a runner. Share out only the running creators' views and it is 0.2.

Monthly views of the creators hydration brands pay, divided by 23,300,000 core US runners.

5. How many people are runners

10.3 to 18.2 million core US runners would use electrolytes.

52.3 million Americans ran on a road in 2025, and 23.3 million of them run 50 or more times a year. Between 44% and 78% of Americans drink sports drinks regularly, depending on their age, so that range is applied to the core runners.

The range runs from the Baby Boomer rate to the Gen Z rate.
Every step, and where each number came from
Step Figure Where it came from
Ran on a road at all in 2025 52,300,000 Published
Of those, not often enough to count as core 29,000,000 Published
So core runners, 50 or more runs a year 23,300,000 Worked out: 52.3 million minus 29 million
Share who drink sports drinks regularly 44% to 78% Our range: the published Baby Boomer rate to the Gen Z rate
Core runners who would use electrolytes 10,252,000 to 18,174,000 Worked out from the two rows above
All road runners who would use electrolytes 23,012,000 to 40,794,000 Worked out the same way
Share of a small brand's first direct sales that come in on a creator's discount code 30% to 40% Published

How to build a creator Discord community, step by step

Step 1: Put one team on it

  • Do: name who recruits creators and who runs the room, in-house.
  • Ex. Bloom: a scouting intern finds creators, a relationship manager takes each one over, a director runs it. 15 to 25 people, never an agency.
  • Done when: one person owns the Discord and one owns recruiting.
  • Watch out: an agency holds the relationship, not you. Bloom has never used one.

More: the full step in the long version

Step 2: Set the bar to get in

  • Do: write down who gets a sample and who gets into the Discord. Getting in is earned.
  • Done when: the bar is one line anyone on the team can apply.

More: the full step in the long version

Step 3: Write the offer before you invite anyone

  • Do: a commission first, a reward ladder on top, and one top prize kept rare.
  • Ex. NeuroGum: only 10 creators go on the trip to Florida, a few get a Rolex.
  • Done when: the rates, the ladder and the prize are on one page.
  • Watch out: creators stay only if they make money. A perk sits on top of the commission, never in place of it.

More: the full step in the long version

Step 4: Gift creators before you open it

  • Do: gift on a fixed weekly number, with nothing asked, and watch who posts.
  • Ex. Grüns: 500 TikTok and Instagram creators and 150 YouTubers a week, in about 2 hours.
  • Ex. goPure: seeds product to affiliates who sign up, and gives them about two weeks to post.
  • Done when: the first creators have cleared the bar from step 2.

More: the full step in the long version

Step 5: Open the Discord and onboard

  • Do: make the Discord the place the rewards live, and train everyone who gets in.
  • Ex. Goli & Force Factor: being in their Discord is a condition of the reward.
  • Ex. NeuroGum: every creator sits a recorded three-hour orientation, a video plus a Notion doc, and they track who finished.
  • Ex. Nutrafol: all partners have to complete Nutrafol Academy.
  • Done when: every member has done the onboarding and knows their tier.

More: the full step in the long version

Step 6: Run it every week

  • Do: put your own people in the room and meet on a fixed schedule.
  • Ex. Bloom: two calls a week on the top videos, real time feedback and FAQs. Briefs are one page.
  • Ex. NeuroGum: the head of growth and the brand manager are in the Discord. The CEO does a Zoom with creators once a quarter.
  • Ex. goPure: rising creators go into a smaller chat, to take them from 5 videos a month to 20.
  • Done when: the calls are on the calendar and someone answers in the room every day.
  • Watch out: retention is the one most brands underrate (Bloom). A room nobody runs goes quiet.

More: the full step in the long version

Step 7: Turn it into posts, sales & ads

  • Do: tie the rewards to posting, take the ad rights with the reward, then cut sampling.
  • Ex. Goli: taking a reward gives Goli the right to run the video on Meta.
  • Ex. Bloom: one big sampling push at launch, then 20-30% of launch volume. Back up only when video volume drops and re-engaging has failed.
  • Done when: posts arrive without a new fee and the winners run as ads.

More: the full step in the long version

Keep in mind: Gymshark still gets 60% plus of new customers from paid ads. The community makes the posts cheaper, it does not replace the ad budget.

Where it breaks: the full list in the long version.

Your end-to-end playbook on an influencer community

The short, start to finish version of this playbook is its own post.


Part of the TikTok Shop affiliate playbook.